Upper-Extremity Self-Amputation and Replantation: 2 Case Reports and a Review of the Literature
J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59:681-692
© Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Background: Patients who deliberately amputate 1 or more of their own extremities present a unique set of challenges for the entire treatment team. Decisions regarding replantation of the amputated extremity must be made quickly, and the psychiatrist is involved early in the care of these difficult patients. Surgical staff may feel that replantation surgery is inappropriate for such patients, although there is limited literature addressing this issue. Therefore, the psychiatrist must also address the strong feelings that such patients generate in nonpsychiatric caregivers.
Method: Two cases of deliberate upper- extremity self-amputation are discussed, and the world literature on self-amputation and replantation from 1966 to the present, identified via a MEDLINE search, using the key words self-amputation, self-inflicted, upper extremity, and amputation, is reviewed.
Results: There have been 11 reported cases (plus 2 in the current report) of deliberate upper- extremity amputation in the last 30 years. All patients have been psychotic, and many of the case reports note that patients with this presentation are rarely suicidal. Instead, the amputation usually stems from psychotically driven feelings of guilt and concrete religious preoccupations. Patients who undergo replantation often are pleased with the reattachment, and both psychiatric and surgical outcomes appear to benefit from prompt and aggressive psychiatric treatment.
Conclusion: Patients who deliberately amputate one or more of their extremities can be unsettling as well as challenging. The psychiatrist must coordinate diagnosis and treatment among multiple services to ensure the best possible outcome. As replantation surgery becomes more common, the psychiatric implications of surgical reattachment are of increasing importance. More cases need to be described to better understand the best treatment options for this particular patient population.