Reply to Letter to the Editor “High Prevalence of Bipolar Spectrum Disorders”
J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62:736 [letter]
© Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Letter to the Editor
Sir: Dr. Benazzi raises some exceedingly important points regarding the diagnosis of bipolar spectrum illness. Currently, the DSM-IV nosology recognizes mania (type I) and hypomania (type II), but there is a large group of patients who are neither classically bipolar (type I) nor classically unipolar (no symptoms at all suggestive of hypomania). In my experience, many practitioners, especially those in private practice, treat a large group of patients in this category. If one were to use a DSM term, one would have to label these patients as having bipolar disorder, not otherwise specified (NOS). However, clinicians are sometimes hesitant to make NOS diagnoses because some insurance plans do not reimburse for NOS diagnoses. Thus, on rather unscientific grounds, many patients are getting labeled as having unipolar depression who do not classically fit those criteria.