Hostility During Admission Interview as a Short-Term Predictor of Aggression in Acute Psychiatric Male Inpatients
J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64(12):1460-1464
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Background: A critical step for improving the
prediction of on-ward violence is the identification of variables
that are not only consistently associated with an increased risk
of aggression but also easily evaluated during the admission
interview. The goal of this prospective study was to assess the
predictive utility of hostility during admission interview.
Method: The sample consisted of 80 newly
admitted male patients with heterogeneous DSM-IV psychiatric
diagnoses recruited from the psychiatric ward of an urban public
hospital. Psychiatric symptoms at admission were assessed with
the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). Aggressive behavior
during the first week of hospitalization was measured with the
Modified Overt Aggression Scale. Data were collected between
January and June 1998.
Results: In a multiple regression model, BPRS
items hostility and tension-excitement emerged as significant
predictors of verbal aggression, whereas thinking disturbance
(high) and suspiciousness-uncooperativeness (low) emerged as
significant predictors of aggression against objects. In
contrast, when aggression was treated as a binary dependent
variable in a logistic model, hostility during the admission
interview had no utility in predicting on-ward aggressive
Conclusion: This study confirms the importance
of distinguishing between different types of aggression to
improve the accuracy of predictions of violence. The findings
suggest that the question whether hostility is a useful
short-term predictor of aggression in psychiatric inpatients
cannot be answered conclusively. The predictive utility of
hostility was relatively high for predicting verbal aggression
but was negligible for predicting other types of aggressive