Methodological Issues in a Comparative Study of Ziprasidone and Risperidone
J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67(1):162-163 [letter]
© Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Because this piece does not have an abstract, we have provided for your benefit the first 3 sentences of the full text.
Sir: Regarding a trial recently reported in the Journal1 comparing risperidone and ziprasidone in the short-term treatment of schizophrenia, we concur with the authors that “more head-to-head comparisons of antipsychotics are needed to discern the relative efficacy and safety profiles of these compounds.”(p1624) This trial furthers progress toward good comparative research in part by illustrating some methodological limitations applicable to future research. The article contains some broad conclusions that do not appear to be supported by the reported data.