Commentary: The Research-to-Practice Gap in Mood Disorders: A Role for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Amy M. Kilbourne, PhD, MPH; Marcia Valenstein, MD; and Mark S. Bauer, MD
J Clin Psychiatry 2007;68(4):502-504
© Copyright 2015 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
To view this item, select one of the options below.
-
-
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
-
Subscribe
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
-
-
Activate
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
-
Sign in
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
-
Click here to login.
-
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Because this piece does not have an abstract, we have provided for your benefit the first 3 sentences of the full text.
There is a persistent gap between the publication of research results and the translation of these findings to routine practice. It typically takes years to decades for a treatment proven efficacious in a randomized controlled trial to be adopted in routine care.1,2Further, for some treatments the risk-benefit profile may change substantially once disseminated.3,4