Commentary: Dimensional Diagnosis and <em>DSM-5</em>
J Clin Psychiatry 2011;72(10):1340
© Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
A dimensional point of view has been very well represented on the DSM-5 Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group, and the leaders of the Task Force have wanted to use personality disorders as a model for change, with the ultimate goal of making all diagnoses in psychiatry quantitative. Some of the possible problems of that approach are discussed in this commentary, including the difficulty of scale validation and determining whether assessment instruments have acceptable psychometrics. Zimmerman et al point out that complex scoring procedures for personality disorders may not even be necessary if, as in DSM-IV, one can score traits as absent, subclinical, or clinically diagnosable. While that is a rough procedure, so are the proposals under consideration for DSM-5.