Dr Spaans and Colleagues Reply
J Clin Psychiatry 2014;75(7):777–778
© Copyright 2015 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Because this piece does not have an abstract, we have provided for your benefit the first 3 sentences of the full text.
To the Editor: We greatly appreciate the comments made by the colleagues from the CORE/PRIDE group with respect to our randomized controlled study in brief and ultrabrief pulse electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and we welcome the opportunity to clarify a number of issues raised.
Differences in techniques between countries demonstrate that any concept of “the ultimate” ECT technique is still illusory. It is doubtful whether the European twice-weekly schedule reduces efficacy significantly compared to thrice-weekly sessions.