| Home | Subscribe to the Journal | Sign up for E-Lerts to your inbox |
| This entire article is available in PDF format to paid subscribers (certain
restrictions apply). If you have not already registered for Full Text Access to The Journal, then visit our registration page. |
A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Adjunctive Bupropion Sustained Release in the Treatment of SSRI-Induced Sexual DysfunctionCharles DeBattista, M.D.; Brent Solvason, M.D.; Jennifer Poirier, Ph.D.; Ellen Kendrick, B.A.; and Emily Loraas, B.A.Background: Sexual side effects are among the common reasons patients discontinue selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). While many antidotes have been proposed, few have been subjected to double-blind trials. Some evidence has suggested that bupropion may be an effective antidote for SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction. In this double-blind trial, the efficacy of a standard dose of bupropion sustained release (SR) is evaluated in the treatment of SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction. Method: Patients with a history of SSRI-induced sexual side effects were randomly assigned to adjunctive treatment with either bupropion SR 150 mg daily or placebo for 6 weeks. Assessments of sexual function and interest included the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX), Brief Index of Sexual Functioning, and a 10-point visual analogue scale. Efficacy was defined as a 50% improvement on the ASEX at the end of 6 weeks. Data were collected from January 1999 to March 2001. Results: Forty-one patients entered the study and completed the 6-week trial. No significant differences were seen between placebo and bupropion SR on the ASEX or on any measure of sexual functioning at the end of the trial. Conclusion: A fixed dose of 150 mg/day of bupropion SR taken in the morning does not appear to be effective in the treatment of SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction. Additional trials will be required to define what role, if any, bupropion might have in the treatment of SSRI-induced sexual side effects. (J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66:844-848) Received June 4, 2004; accepted Dec. 7, 2004. From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif. This study was supported by a grant from GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. DeBattista has served as a consultant to Wyeth, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Corcept Therapeutics; has received grant/research support from the National Institute of Mental Health, Pratzker Foundation, Cephalon, Eli Lilly, Cyberonics, Neuronetics, Somerset, and Wyeth; has participated in speakers or advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline, Wyeth, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Cephalon, Abbott, and Corcept Therapeutics; and is a stockholder in Corcept Therapeutics. Drs. Solvason and Poirier and Mss. Kendrick and Loraas have received grant/research support from GlaxoSmithKline. Corresponding author and reprints: Charles DeBattista, M.D., Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 401 Quarry Rd., Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 (e-mail: debattista@stanford.edu). |
| Home | Subscribe to the Journal | Sign up for E-Lerts to your inbox |