This entire article is available in PDF format to paid subscribers (certain restrictions apply).
If you have not already registered for Full Text Access to The Journal, then visit our registration page.

Comparison of Quetiapine and Risperidone in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Flexible-Dose, 8-Week Study

Kate X. Zhong, M.D.; Dennis E. Sweitzer, Ph.D.;Robert M. Hamer, Ph.D.; and Jeffrey A. Lieberman, M.D.


Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine and risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Method: In this 8-week, double-blind, multicenter, flexible-dose study, patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV diagnosis) were randomly assigned to quetiapine (200-800 mg/day) or risperidone (2-8 mg/day). The primary hypothesis was that quetiapine was not inferior to risperidone. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores; secondary outcomes included response rate (> = 40% reduction in PANSS scores), Clinical Global Impression-Change (CGI-C), and cognitive and social functioning. Tolerability assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events and changes in weight, glucose, and prolactin. Patients were recruited from June 2001 to September 2002.

Results: Patients (N = 673) were randomly assigned to quetiapine (N = 338, mean dose = 525 mg/day) or risperidone (N = 335, mean dose = 5.2 mg/day). The primary analysis demonstrated noninferiority between treatments (p < .05). Improvements with both treatments were comparable on PANSS total, negative, and general psychopathology subscales. Risperidone-treated patients had a significantly (p = .03) greater improvement in PANSS positive subscale score among all patients, but not among completers. Improvements in PANSS response rates, CGI-C, and cognitive function were similar between treatment groups. Changes in serum glucose and weight were minimal and comparable. The rate of extrapyramidal symptom (EPS)-related adverse events was significantly higher with risperidone (22%) than quetiapine (13%; p < .01). Somnolence was more common with quetiapine (26%) than risperidone (20%; p = .04). Prolactin levels increased with risperidone (+35.5 ng/mL), but decreased with quetiapine (-11.5 ng/mL; p < .001).

Conclusions: Quetiapine and risperidone had broadly comparable clinical efficacy. Both agents improved cognitive and social functioning, and neither had a clinically significant effect on weight or glucose. Somnolence was more common with quetiapine; EPS and elevated prolactin rates were significantly higher with risperidone.

(J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67:1093-1103)


Received Aug. 22, 2005, accepted May 16, 2006. From AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, Del. (Drs. Zhong and Sweitzer); the Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C. (Dr. Hamer); and the Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, N.Y. (Dr. Lieberman). Dr. Zhong is a former employee of AstraZeneca.

The study was funded by AstraZeneca. Drs. Lieberman and Hamer participated in supervision and interpretation of data analyses and in the drafting and revision of the manuscript. Sally K. Laden, M.S., provided medical writing support on behalf of AstraZeneca.

Financial disclosure appears at the end of this article.

Participating investigators are listed at the end of this article.

Corresponding author and reprints: Dennis E. Sweitzer, Ph.D., AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 1800 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19850 (e-mail: Dennis.sweitzer@astrazeneca.com).