| Home | Subscribe to the Journal | Sign up for E-Lerts to your inbox |
| This
entire article is available in PDF format to paid subscribers (certain restrictions apply). If you have not already registered for Full Text Access to The Journal, then visit our registration page. |
Antidepressants and Driving Ability: Results From a Clinical StudyAlexander Brunnauer, Ph.D.; Gerd Laux, M.D., Ph.D.; Elisabeth Geiger, M.S.; Michael Soyka, M.D.; and Hans-Jürgen Möller, M.D.Objective: Psychomotor disturbances can frequently be found in depressed patients and may have an important influence on the ability to drive. Additionally, effects of sedation, as seen with some antidepressants, probably impair driving performance. The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of antidepressant monotherapy on psychomotor functions related to car-driving skills in depressive patients in a routine clinical setting. Method: Inpatients (N = 100) who met the ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder were tested under steady-state plasma level conditions prior to being discharged to outpatient treatment. The study ran from January 2004 through March 2005. All patients participated voluntarily and gave informed consent. According to the German guidelines for road and traffic safety, data were collected with the computerized Act & React Testsystem ART-90 and the Wiener Testsystem, measuring visual perception, reaction time, selective attention, vigilance, and stress tolerance. Psychopathologic symptoms were rated with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Results: Before discharge to outpatient treatment, 24% of the patients tested were without clinically relevant psychomotor disturbances. In 60% of the cases, mild to moderate impairments could be seen, and about 16% of the patients were considered as severely impaired in psychomotor functions related to car-driving abilities. Data show that patients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or the noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (NaSSA) mirtazapine had an altogether better test performance in comparison with patients receiving tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs). Differences were most pronounced in measures of reactivity, stress tolerance, and selective attention. Statistically significant differences between patients treated with TCAs or the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) venlafaxine could not be found. Among the newer antidepressants there is an advantage for patients treated with mirtazapine, especially in tasks with high multi-channel perception and output demands. Conclusion: About 16% of depressive patients discharged from hospital to outpatient treatment must be considered unfit to drive. In 60% of the cases, patients performed at a questionable level of fitness for driving, and it seems justified to counsel patients individually, taking into account compensational factors. Data point to an advantage for patients treated with SSRIs or mirtazapine when compared with TCAs or venlafaxine. However, causal relationships cannot be drawn from our data. (J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67:1776-1781) Received Nov. 9, 2005; accepted May 10, 2006. From the District Hospital Gabersee, Academic Hospital of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Neurology, Wasserburg/Inn (Drs. Brunnauer and Laux and Ms. Geiger), and the Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich (Drs. Laux, Soyka, and Möller), Germany. The authors report no financial or other relationships relevant to the subject matter of this article. The authors thank Ms. Michaela Wende and Ms. Brigitte Peter, medical staff technicians, for administration of the computerized tests. Corresponding author and reprints: Alexander Brunnauer, Ph.D., Bezirksklinikum Gabersee, Department of Neuropsychology, D-83512 Wasserburg/Inn, Germany (e-mail: Brunnauer.Alexander@gabersee.de). |
| Home | Subscribe to the Journal | Sign up for E-Lerts to your inbox |