The Infrequency of "Pure Culture" Diagnoses Among the Anxiety Disorders
J Clin Psychiatry 1996;57(11):528-533
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Background: Anxiety disorders are known to commonly coexist in individuals, both with other anxiety disorders and with mental disorders from other groupings, such as affective disorders. We questioned how frequently anxiety disorders actually occur in isolation, as “pure cultures.”
Method: We examined diagnostic patterns among the 711 subjects entered into a large, multicenter study of anxiety disorders, the Harvard/ Brown Anxiety Disorders Research Program (HARP), which focused on panic, agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, and social phobias as “index disorders” required for intake.
Results: We used various definitions for “pure culture.” By all definitions, subjects with “pure culture” represented a minority, especially in cases of generalized anxiety disorder and social phobia, where comorbidity was virtually ubiquitous. “Pure culture” status was associated with later onset of illness and less chronicity.
Conclusion: Future studies of anxiety disorders should aim to document the extensive comorbidity, rather than eliminate it by restrictive diagnostic exclusion criteria, lest they yield atypical or even misrepresented groups of patients. Clinicians should not stop at identifying only the “main” diagnosis but look for other, comorbid diagnoses that are often present.