Predictive Value of Eosinophilia for Neutropenia During Clozapine Treatment
J Clin Psychiatry 1996;57(12):579-581
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Background: Myelotoxicity continues to hinder the widespread use of clozapine in the United States. It has been theorized that eosinophilia predicts later agranulocytosis and that agranulocytosis occurs due to an immunologic mechanism. Our study compares the rates of these dyscrasias in clozapine-treated patients and a control group.
Method: Forty-one patients taking clozapine and 29 patients taking haloperidol were monitored for a period of 6 months. Rates of eosinophilia and neutropenia were compared between the two treatment groups.
Results: Treatment-emergent eosinophilia occurred frequently in both haloperidol- and clozapine- treated patients. No significant difference was seen between groups in the incidence of eosinophilia and neutropenia.
Conclusion: We find no statistical difference between the rates of eosinophilia or neutropenia in haloperidol- and clozapine-treated patients. This study does not support the use of eosinophilia as a reliable predictor of neutropenia.