A Meta-Analysis of Eight Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Clinical Trials of Mirtazapine for the Treatment of Patients With Major Depression and Symptoms of Anxiety
J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59(3):128-130
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Background: Patients diagnosed with major depression and prominent symptoms of anxiety often have a poor prognosis for recovery. A metaanalysis was performed to assess the efficacy of mirtazapine in comparison with placebo and amitriptyline for the relief of anxiety/agitation or anxiety/somatization in patients with major depressive illness.
Method: A meta-analysis of eight randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials was conducted for 161 mirtazapine-treated and 132 placebo-treated patients with a DSM-III diagnosis of major depression, baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) scores ≥18, and a baseline score ≥6 for the sum of HAM-D items 9, 10, and 11 (anxiety/agitation). Four of the clinical trials included an amitriptyline control group (N=92).
Results: Mirtazapine-treated patients demonstrated a statistically significant (p≤.05) reduction in the sum of HAM-D items 9, 10, and 11 (anxiety/agitation) compared with placebotreated patients at Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 and at the endpoint. There was no statistically significant difference between the mirtazapine- and amitriptyline- treated patients at Weeks 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 and at the endpoint. Similar results were found for the analysis of the mean of HAM-D items 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17 (anxiety/somatization or HAMD Factor Score I) using all treated patients with a post-baseline evaluation in all 8 studies. Mirtazapine- treated patients demonstrated a statistically significant (p≤.03) greater reduction at Weeks 1–6 compared with placebo, and improvement in the mirtazapine group was comparable to improvement in the amitriptyline group at Weeks 1–6.
Conclusion: In this meta-analysis of eight randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials, mirtazapine was found to be superior to placebo and comparable to amitriptyline for the treatment of patients with major depression with symptoms of anxiety/agitation or anxiety/somatization.