Longitudinal Follow-Up of Naturalistic Treatment Outcome in Patients With Trichotillomania
J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62(2):101-107
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Background: Little is known about the
longitudinal course of treatment outcome in patients with
trichotillomania. The authors conducted a second follow-up
assessment on a cohort of hair pullers previously studied.
Method: Forty-four subjects completed a
hair-pulling questionnaire and paper-and-pencil measures of
hair-pulling severity and impact, psychosocial functioning,
depression, anxiety, and self-esteem. Mean time elapsed between
the first and second follow-up assessment was 2.5 years (index
evaluation to first follow-up = 3.5 years).
Results: Twenty-seven subjects (61.4%) had
active treatment since the first follow-up. No significant
changes in hair pulling, depression, anxiety, or psychosocial
functioning were reported from first to second follow-up.
Self-esteem scores significantly worsened during this period (p =
.000). A trend toward worsening also existed for psychosocial
impact scores. Comparison of scores at index evaluation with
second follow-up still showed significant improvement over time
for hair pulling (p = .001) but significant worsening in
self-esteem (p = .000). Treatment and responder status were
unrelated to clinical functioning, with the exception of
depression and psychosocial impact.
Conclusion: Although hair pullers exhibit
initial improvement with treatment, scale scores plateau or
worsen by second follow-up. Significant worsening in self-esteem
at second follow-up may be related to the absence of further
improvements in hair-pulling severity. Future research should
focus on the interrelationships among self-esteem, depression,
and hair pulling during treatment for this disorder.