Nefazodone Treatment of Pathological Gambling: A Prospective Open-Label Controlled Trial
J Clin Psychiatry 2002;63:1034-1039
© Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Background: Pathological gambling is a disabling and highly prevalent impulse-control disorder not otherwise specified (NOS). According to the hypothesis of abnormal serotonin function in the pathophysiology of poor impulse control and pathological gambling, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of nefazodone, a 5-HT antagonist reported to be effective in other impulse-control disorders NOS, in the treatment of pathological gambling.
Method: Fourteen outpatients who met DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling were enrolled in a prospective 8-week open-label oral nefazodone trial. Nefazodone was initiated at 50 mg/day and titrated upward to a maximum of 500 mg/day based on patient's response and side effects, with a minimum daily dose of 100 mg. Improvement in gambling was assessed via the pathological gambling modifications of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (PG-YBOCS), the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (PG-CGI-I), and self-rated gambling scales. Response was defined a priori as both a 25% reduction in PG-YBOCS score and a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the PG-CGI-I scale.
Results: Twelve subjects completed the study, and 2 subjects were early dropouts who did not receive the minimum required dose. Significant improvements were noted in all gambling outcome measures, as well as in depression and anxiety ratings (which did not significantly correlate with gambling reduction). Nine (75%) of 12 patients were rated as responders according to a priori criteria. Side effects (dry mouth and sedation) of moderate severity occurred in 4 subjects.
Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that nefazodone may be effective in reducing symptoms of pathological gambling and is well tolerated.