Clinical Predictors of Drug Nonresponse in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66(12):1517-1523
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
disorder (OCD) is often a chronic and disabling
illness with high comorbidity. Serotonin reuptake
inhibitors (SRIs) are effective in treating OCD. However, 40% to 60% of patients with OCD
do not respond adequately to SRIs. This study aims to identify the clinical predictors of
nonresponse to SRIs in OCD by comparing SRI
responders and nonresponders.
Method: 122 subjects with a diagnosis
of DSM-IV OCD of at least 1 year's duration and with treatment history of adequate trials with
at least 2 SRIs were recruited from December 2002 to March 2004. Of these, 67 were SRI
responders and 55 were SRI nonresponders; they were
compared on various clinical parameters. Nonresponse was defined as a score of > = 3 on
the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement subscale (CGI-I) after at least 2 adequate trials
with SRIs. Response was defined as a score of 1 or
2 on the CGI-I.
Results: In regression analysis, baseline
severity of OCD (p = .049), comorbid major depressive disorder (p = .005), presence of sexual
obsessions (p = .002), and washing (p = .008) and miscellaneous compulsions (p = .013) were
identified as predictors of nonresponse to SRIs.
Early age at onset showed a trend toward prediction
of nonresponse (p = .056). In the univariate
analysis, mixed OCD (p = .001) and poor insight
(p = .023) were associated with nonresponse.
Conclusion: This study has identified
clinical predictors of nonresponse to SRIs. These
predictors may have to be taken into consideration
and assessed carefully when SRIs are prescribed to treat OCD. Future studies should aim at
identifying treatment modalities that are effective in