Decisional Capacity to Consent to Research Among Patients With Bipolar Disorder: Comparison With Schizophrenia Patients and Healthy Subjects
J Clin Psychiatry 2007;68(5):689-696
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Objective: Although clinical trials are needed to advance treatments for bipolar disorder, there has been little empirical research on the capacity of bipolar patients to consent to research. The aim of the present study was to evaluate levels of decisional capacity of bipolar patients compared with those of schizophrenia patients and healthy comparison subjects, as well as to examine whether symptom and neurocognitive deficits correlate with patients' decisional abilities.
Method: Participants were 31 outpatients with bipolar disorder, 31 outpatients with schizophrenia, and 28 healthy comparison subjects; each participant's decisional capacity was evaluated with the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research. Patient participants were also evaluated with standardized clinical rating scales and neurocognitive tests. Data were collected from April 2002 through November 2005.
Results: Bipolar patients had worse understanding than healthy comparison subjects, and their level of decisional capacity did not differ from that of schizophrenia patients. Within the combined patient sample, neurocognitive deficits and negative symptoms were significantly correlated (p < .05) with the level of decisional capacity (particularly, understanding of disclosed information). Repeating the missed information improved the level of understanding in all groups.
Conclusions: The presence of bipolar disorder appears to be a risk factor for impaired understanding of information disclosed under standard consent procedures but should not be equated with a lack of competence to consent. The observed improvement in understanding with redisclosure of information suggests that enhanced consent procedures may be useful during enrollment of bipolar patients in research.