Efficacy and Tolerability of Asenapine in Acute Schizophrenia: A Placebo- and Risperidone-Controlled Trial
J Clin Psychiatry 2007;68(10):1492-1500
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Objective: This 6-week trial assessed the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the investigational psychopharmacologic agent asenapine versus placebo and risperidone in patients with acute schizophrenia (DSM-IV criteria).
Method: In a study conducted from August 2001 to May 2002, patients were randomly assigned to receive sublingual asenapine 5 mg b.i.d., placebo b.i.d., or oral risperidone 3 mg b.i.d. The primary outcome measure was improvement from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. Secondary outcomes included changes in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score and scores on PANSS positive, negative, and general psychopathology subscales.
Results: The intent-to-treat population comprised 174 patients who received >= 1 dose of study drug and >= 1 postbaseline assessment. At study end or last observation, mean improvements on PANSS total, negative subscale, and general psychopathology subscale scores were all significantly greater with asenapine than with placebo (p < .005, p = .01, and p < .005, respectively). Compared with placebo, improvements on CGI-S and PANSS positive subscale scores were significantly greater with both asenapine (p < .01 and p = .01) and risperidone (p < .005 and p < .05). Overall incidence rates of adverse events were comparable for asenapine and placebo, whereas risperidone was associated with substantial weight gain and prolactin elevation.
Conclusion: Asenapine was effective and well tolerated in patients with acute schizophrenia and may provide a new option for control of negative symptoms.