Are Psychological and Pharmacologic Interventions Equally Effective in the Treatment of Adult Depressive Disorders? A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
J Clin Psychiatry 2008;69(11):1675-1685
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Objective: A large number of studies suggest that both psychological and pharmacologic therapies are effective in the treatment of mild-to-moderate depressive disorders. Whether both types of intervention are equally effective has not been established definitively.
Data Sources: A database was developed through a comprehensive literature search (from 1966 to May 2007) in which 6947 abstracts in PubMed (1244 abstracts), PsycINFO (1736), EMBASE (1911), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2056) were examined. Abstracts were identified by combining terms indicative of psychological treatment and depression (both MeSH terms and text words). For this database, the primary studies from 22 meta-analyses of psychological treatment for depression were also collected.
Study Selection: For the current study, the abstracts of 832 studies were examined.
Data Extraction: Thirty randomized trials were included in a meta-analysis that compared the effects of a psychological treatment for 3178 adults with a diagnosed depressive disorder (major depressive disorder, dysthymia, minor depressive disorder) with the effects of a pharmacologic treatment.
Data Synthesis: In studies of patients with dysthymia, pharmacotherapy was significantly more effective than psychotherapy (d = -0.28, 95% CI = -0.47 to -0.10). In patients with major depressive disorder, treatments with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were significantly more effective than psychological treatments, while treatment with other antidepressants did not differ significantly. Subgroup and metaregression analyses did not show that pretest severity of depressive symptoms was associated with differential effects of psychological and pharmacologic treatments of major depressive disorder. Dropout rates were smaller in psychological interventions compared with pharmacologic treatments (odds ratio = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.47 to 0.92).
Conclusions: Pharmacologic treatments may
be more effective than psychological interventions
in the treatment of dysthymia. Pharmacologic
treatment with SSRIs may also be more effective
in the treatment of major depressive disorder,
although these differences are small and probably
have little meaning from a clinical point of view.
We can conclude that both psychological and
pharmacologic therapies are effective in the treatment
of depressive disorders and that each has
its own merits.