Assessing the Efficacy of Desvenlafaxine for Improving Functioning and Well-Being Outcome Measures in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Pooled Analysis of 9 Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 8-Week Clinical Trials
J Clin Psychiatry 2009;70(10):1365-1371
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Objective: To evaluate the effects of desvenlafaxine therapy on functioning and well-being in major depressive disorder (MDD).
Method: Total and individual item Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and 5-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) scores from 8 double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week desvenlafaxine clinical trials were pooled. Scores on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) work/activities and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) lassitude items were pooled from 9 studies. Outpatients with DSM-IV MDD were randomly assigned to fixed(5 studies; 50, 100, 200, or 400 mg/d; n = 1,342)or flexible (4 studies, 100–400 mg/d; n = 463) doses of desvenlafaxine or placebo (n = 1,108). Data from each patient’s final evaluation were analyzed for the total population and for individual dose groups from the fixed-dose studies and were compared between groups using analysis of covariance.
Results: Compared with placebo, desvenlafaxine therapy resulted in significantly greater improvements in SDS total score (–2.0) and individual items regarding work (–0.6), social life/leisure activities (–0.8), and family life/home responsibilities (–0.7; P < .001 for all comparisons), as well as WHO-5 total score (1.7) and individual items (good spirits [0.4], calm/relaxed [0.4],
active/vigorous [0.3], fresh/rested [0.3], and
interest [0.3]; P < .001 for all comparisons).
Desvenlafaxine treatment resulted in significant improvements on the HDRS17 work/activities
(–0.2; P < .001) and MADRS lassitude (–0.3; P < .001) items compared with placebo. Significant differences were observed for the individual fixed-dose groups on all outcomes (P < .05); there was
no evidence of a dose-response relationship.
Conclusions: Desvenlafaxine therapy resulted in significant improvements in the functioning and well-being among MDD patients.
Submitted: February 13, 2009; accepted July 10, 2009.
Corresponding author: Claudio N. Soares, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Mood Disorders Division, McMaster University, 301 James St South, FB 638, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 3B6, Canada (email@example.com).