The article you requested is

The Neurobiology of the Switch Process in Bipolar Disorder: A Review

J Clin Psychiatry 2010;71(11):1488-1501
10.4088/JCP.09r05259gre

Objective: The singular phenomenon of switching from depression to its opposite state of mania or hypomania, and vice versa, distinguishes bipolar disorder from all other psychiatric disorders. Despite the fact that it is a core aspect of the clinical presentation of bipolar disorder, the neurobiology of the switch process is still poorly understood. In this review, we summarize the clinical evidence regarding somatic interventions associated with switching, with a particular focus on the biologic underpinnings presumably involved in the switch process.

Data Sources: Literature for this review was obtained through a search of the MEDLINE database (1966–2008) using the following keywords and phrases: switch, bipolar disorder, bipolar depression, antidepressant, SSRIs, tricyclic antidepressants, norepinephrine, serotonin, treatment emergent affective switch, mania, hypomania, HPA-axis, glucocorticoids, amphetamine, dopamine, and sleep deprivation.

Study Selection: All English-language, peer-reviewed, published literature, including randomized controlled studies, naturalistic and open-label studies, and case reports, were eligible for inclusion.

Data Synthesis: Converging evidence suggests that certain pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions with very different mechanisms of action, such as sleep deprivation, exogenous corticosteroids, and dopaminergic agonists, can trigger mood episode switches in patients with bipolar disorder. The switch-inducing potential of antidepressants is unclear, although tricyclic antidepressants, which confer higher risk of switching than other classes of antidepressants, are a possible exception. Several neurobiological factors appear to be associated with both spontaneous and treatment-emergent mood episode switches; these include abnormalities in catecholamine levels, up-regulation of neurotrophic and neuroplastic factors, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity, and circadian rhythms.

Conclusions: There is a clear need to improve our understanding of the neurobiology of the switch process; research in this field would benefit from the systematic and integrated assessment of variables associated with switching.

J Clin Psychiatry

Submitted: April 1, 2009; accepted June 9, 2009.

Online ahead of print: May 4, 2010 (doi:10.4088/JCP.09r05259gre)

Corresponding author: Carlos A. Zarate Jr, MD, Experimental Therapeutics, Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Research Center, 10 Center Dr, Unit 7SE, Rm 7-3445, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892-1282 (zaratec@mail.nih.gov).

 

The Neurobiology of the Switch Process in Bipolar Disorder: A Review

Objective: The singular phenomenon of switching from depression to its opposite state of mania or hypomania, and vice versa, distinguishes bipolar disorder from all other psychiatric disorders. Despite the fact that it is a core aspect of the clinical presentation of bipolar disorder, the neurobiology of the switch process is still poorly understood. In this review, we summarize the clinical evidence regarding somatic interventions associated with switching, with a particular focus on the biologic underpinnings presumably involved in the switch process.

Data Sources: Literature for this review was obtained through a search of the MEDLINE database (1966–2008) using the following keywords and phrases: switch, bipolar disorder, bipolar depression, antidepressant, SSRIs, tricyclic antidepressants, norepinephrine, serotonin, treatment emergent affective switch, mania, hypomania, HPA-axis, glucocorticoids, amphetamine, dopamine, and sleep deprivation.

Study Selection: All English-language, peer-reviewed, published literature, including randomized controlled studies, naturalistic and open-label studies, and case reports, were eligible for inclusion.

Data Synthesis: Converging evidence suggests that certain pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions with very different mechanisms of action, such as sleep deprivation, exogenous corticosteroids, and dopaminergic agonists, can trigger mood episode switches in patients with bipolar disorder. The switch-inducing potential of antidepressants is unclear, although tricyclic antidepressants, which confer higher risk of switching than other classes of antidepressants, are a possible exception. Several neurobiological factors appear to be associated with both spontaneous and treatment-emergent mood episode switches; these include abnormalities in catecholamine levels, up-regulation of neurotrophic and neuroplastic factors, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity, and circadian rhythms.

Conclusions: There is a clear need to improve our understanding of the neurobiology of the switch process; research in this field would benefit from the systematic and integrated assessment of variables associated with switching.

J Clin Psychiatry 2010;71(11):1488–1501

Submitted: April 1, 2009; accepted June 9, 2009.

Online ahead of print: May 4, 2010 (doi:10.4088/JCP.09r05259gre)

Corresponding author: Carlos A. Zarate Jr, MD, Experimental Therapeutics, Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Research Center, 10 Center Dr, Unit 7SE, Rm 7-3445, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892-1282 (zaratec@mail.nih.gov).

The singular phenomenon of switching from depression to its opposite state of mania or hypomania, and vice versa, distinguishes bipolar disorder from all other psychiatric disorders. Although symptoms such as depressed mood, insomnia, paranoid ideation, anxiety, and appetite changes are experienced across many psychiatric disorders, the process of switching from depression to a state of mania or hypomania is a unique and core feature of bipolar disorder. Currently, no uniform definition exists to describe the switch phenomenon; herein, we have defined it as a sudden transition from a mood episode to another episode of the opposite polarity. The importance of the switch process as the hallmark of bipolar disorder was originally described in 1854 by Falret,1 who conceptualized circular insanity, which he defined as a form of illness in which “depression and mania must succeed one another for a long time, usually for the whole of the patient’s life, and in a fashion very nearly regular, and with intervals of rationality, which are usually short compared with the length of the episodes”2(p1130)

Historically, abrupt changes in mood polarity were described well before the beginning of the psychopharmacologic era. Manic features observed after a depressive episode were commonly described as “post-melancholic reactive hyperthymia,” while mania that evolved into depression was referred to as “reactive depression.”3 Retrospective data obtained from patients hospitalized between 1920 and 1959 show a rate of 29% for spontaneous switching from depression to hypomania.4 However, in modern psychiatry, the term switch connotes not only switches in mood polarity as a core feature of bipolar disorder but also treatment-emergent affective switch (TEAS)—often from depression to mania/hypomania. The fact that the term switch is now used synonymously to encompass both types of mood shifts has led psychiatrists to neglect the study of both spontaneous switches (ie, non–treatment related) as well as the transition from mania/hypomania to depression.

A possible reason for the dearth of modern studies addressing the neurobiology of spontaneous switches is that, presently, most patients with bipolar disorder have complex treatment regimens involving multiple drugs, so that the vast majority of clinical trials done in patients with bipolar disorder enroll patients who are already medicated. Conversely, most of the data regarding non–treatment-induced switches (spontaneous switches) derive from studies conducted 2 to 3 decades ago when the efficacy of lithium as a prophylactic agent in bipolar disorder was still debated and when monotherapy trials with antidepressants were still being conducted, at least in the United States. As a result, most of the evidence presented in this article refers to TEAS, unless otherwise specified. The issue of TEAS itself is also one that continues to be the center of considerable controversy. There is genuine uncertainty regarding the potential benefit or harm associated with the use of antidepressants during depressive episodes of bipolar disorder. Because the depressed phase of bipolar disorder is associated with significant morbidity and increased risk of suicide, this is a significant public health challenge.

Despite the importance of the switch phenomenon, the precise mechanisms underlying the process have yet to be elucidated. Moreover, the neurobiology and long-term clinical consequences of the switch process are still poorly understood. Switching from depression to mania/ hypomania can occur spontaneously over the course of the illness, but it can also be precipitated by stress, sleep deprivation, or standard treatment for bipolar depression such as electroconvulsive therapy and some antidepressants5,6 (see below), as well as various other agents (eg, amphetamines and glucocorticoids). In addition, recent evidence suggests that genes that regulate monoaminergic transmission or circadian rhythms might increase individual susceptibility for switching.7–9 Another key issue is that most of the research on both spontaneous switches and TEAS has observed the switch from depression into mania. Because the switch from mania to depression occurs in a relatively smaller proportion of patients with bipolar disorder than the switch from depression into mania,10 data regarding this phenomenon are very sparse, but in this review are noted whenever possible.

Across the spectrum of bipolar disorder, there is wide individual variability in how often any given individual diagnosed with bipolar disorder will have either spontaneous switching or TEAS. Clinically, this information can be quite important, because having a pattern of switching is associated with several clinical consequences. For instance, evidence suggests that, compared to nonswitchers, switchers have a higher genetic loading for mood disorders, spend more time ill during the course of their lifetime, experience significantly more comorbidities, and are at greater risk for developing substance abuse or committing suicide.11–14 TEAS in particular is believed to be associated with worsening clinical outcome, including cycle acceleration.15,16 It is also unknown whether individuals switch only when exposed to particular triggers (eg, antidepressants, glucocorticoids, sleep deprivation), whether switchers have a general propensity to switch in response to any given treatment known to induce switch, or whether some individuals are genetically more likely to experience switching regardless of triggers. Understanding this unique process is crucial to our understanding of the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. Notably, although the switch process may be involved in the phenomenon of rapid cycling and cycle acceleration, the intention of this review is to focus primarily on the switch process and not necessarily on rapid cycling and cycle acceleration or the possible long-term prognostic implications of switching. Switching is an event circumscribed to a period of time that facilitates its study and is more likely to yield information on the molecular underpinnings of the switch process per se; in contrast, rapid cycling and cycle acceleration occur over a longer period of time and are likely to be associated with distinct neurobiological correlates that may or may not be involved in switching.

In this review, we will first discuss the clinical predictors of switching and their significance. We will then discuss the clinical evidence regarding pharmacologic interventions associated with switching, with a particular focus on the individual neurotransmitter systems and the possible biologic mechanisms involved in this process.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Literature for this review was obtained by searching the MEDLINE database (1966–2008) using the following keywords and phrases: switch, bipolar disorder, bipolar depression, antidepressant, SSRIs, tricyclic antidepressants, norepinephrine, serotonin, treatment emergent affective switch, mania, hypomania, HPA-axis, glucocorticoids, amphetamine, dopamine, and sleep deprivation. All English-language, peer-reviewed, published studies, including randomized controlled trials, naturalistic and open-label studies, and case-reports, were eligible for inclusion.

CLINICAL PREDICTORS OF SWITCH AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE

Few studies have tried to characterize the clinical characteristics of the switch process in bipolar disorder or its prognostic significance. To study the clinical and prognostic correlates of the phenomenon of switching in patients with bipolar disorder, Maj and colleagues14 prospectively compared a group of patients who experienced a mood switch (defined as a sudden transition from a mood episode to another episode of the opposite polarity with an intervening period of no more than 1 month) to a comparison group of subjects who did not experience any switches during an observational period of at least 3 years. The study found that switchers were more likely to have a greater number of hospitalizations previous to their study index episode and to need more time to recover from their index episode. Furthermore, the time to 50% probability of recovery was significantly longer for patients who experienced more than 1 switch (ie, those having a polyphasic episode) during their index episode (44 weeks) compared to patients who had only 1 switch (ie, those having a biphasic episode) (12 weeks) or to nonswitchers (7 weeks). Likewise, patients with more than 1 switch spent more time in mood episodes during the observational period following the index episode than the other 2 groups. In this study, switching from depression to mania/hypomania was associated with a poorer prognosis as well as an increased risk of switching during subsequent episodes than switching from mania/hypomania to depression. In addition, switchers were more likely to show psychomotor retardation than nonswitchers. However, gender, a positive family history of bipolar disorder, nor age at recruitment were significant predictors of switching.14

Another retrospective study found that the presence of mixed symptoms during a depressive episode was associated with an increased risk of having a manic switch.17 In another study, Zarate and colleagues18 found that a mixed manic presentation was a strong predictor of switch from mania to depression. They investigated clinical and demographic predictors of switch from mania to depression in 28 switchers and 148 nonswitchers. In this study, switching from mania to depression was not associated with a longer time to recovery or earlier time to relapse during the 24-month follow-up period. In these 2 studies, the treatment status at the time of switching was not controlled for, as the patients were undergoing uncontrolled treatment with multiple classes of drugs. A recent observational study10 that investigated the switch from mania to depression noted that a history of previous depressive episodes, substance abuse, greater overall severity on the Clinical Global Impressions scale-Bipolar Version (CGI-BP), and benzodiazepine use all increased the risk of this type of switch. Conversely, the authors also identified factors associated with lower switch rates from mania to depression, including atypical antipsychotic use, lower Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) severity, and higher CGI-BP depression scores.10

Several clinical variables have been studied specifically as potential predictors of TEAS, including gender, diagnosis, age, number of previous episodes of mania, previous history of TEAS, and polarity of onset episode. Some studies have found that switchers have a higher number of past manic episodes,19 while others found more past manic episodes in nonswitchers,20 and still others found no differences between switchers and nonswitchers21 on this variable. Serretti and colleagues20 found an association between TEAS and depressive polarity of illness onset, but this was not replicated in subsequent studies.22,23 Two studies20,24 reported that switchers were older at intake, but the opposite association (ie, earlier age at intake) was reported in a more recent study.22 Also, a positive past history for TEAS was found to predict current TEAS in some22 but not all studies.19,25 A positive history of rapid cycling has also been associated with TEAS.20,22 However, gender, family history, age at onset, and substance abuse have not been found to predict TEAS.20,22,23

In addition, a number of studies have focused specifically on clinical predictors of TEAS when antidepressants are administered. Data from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder22 suggest that a past history of multiple antidepressant trials is associated with TEAS.22 A history of past TEAS also seems to be associated with the development of chronic dysphoria following antidepressant administration.26 Another important question is whether patients with bipolar I disorder and bipolar II disorder differ in their risk for TEAS; while some studies27 detected an increased likelihood of switch in patients with bipolar I disorder, others21,28 reported no difference, or increased risk for subjects with bipolar II disorder.20 However, a recent meta-analysis29 that combined results from 9 different studies assessing TEAS rates in patients with bipolar I disorder and bipolar II disorder noted that patients with bipolar I disorder had a significantly higher risk of TEAS (14.2% vs 7.1%, respectively).

ANTIDEPRESSANTS AND SWITCH

The evidence regarding the likelihood that antidepressant treatment in individuals with bipolar disorder confers increased risk of TEAS has long been controversial and inconclusive, and it is beyond the scope of this review to extensively discuss this controversy (we refer the interested reader to some authoritative reviews on the topic5,30,31).

Virtually all antidepressants have been associated with increased risk for TEAS; studies21 have found that antidepressant-induced TEAS ranges from 10% to 70%, depending on the methodological heterogeneity of the study design, concomitant treatment, and the type of statistical analyses conducted. Many researchers have recently discussed the methodological flaws associated with many of the studies from which this evidence was drawn.5,30 These include investigating switch potential as a secondary aim or post hoc analysis, heterogeneity in terms of concomitant treatments administered to patients, and lack of agreement on TEAS-defining criteria. Similarly, different diagnostic criteria, such as heterogeneity of YMRS score cutoff for defining a switch, and duration of follow-up need to be considered when interpreting the results (Table 1 for an overview of switch criteria used in the studies described herein). Ideally, in order for results to be comparable across studies, a single a priori definition of switching should be provided, with fulfillment of DSM-IV criteria for mania or hypomania within a short time frame (eg, 6 weeks) from the beginning of antidepressant treatment in patients experiencing a depressive episode. Our present lack of a consensus definition or temporal criteria may dilute the biologic underpinnings of this phenomenon, because subjects who develop affective switch within very different time frames from the start of antidepressant treatments are considered equivalent. This methodological issue has been recently emphasized by a task force of the International Society for Bipolar Disorder, which recommended empirical testing in clinical trials of the reliability of different definitions of switch.6

Table 1

Click figure to enlarge

Another critical issue is the uncertainty regarding switch rates in unmedicated patients; for instance, retrospective data obtained from patients hospitalized between 1920 and 1959 found a rate of 29% for spontaneous switching from depression to hypomania.4 Without a clear benchmark estimating the rate at which patients are likely to switch spontaneously, it can be difficult to assess the degree to which antidepressants increase that risk. Relatedly, the fact that most patients with bipolar disorder receive antidepressants concomitantly with mood stabilizers32 makes switch rates even more difficult to estimate accurately.

Despite these limitations, results from clinical trials may provide important clues to understanding the neurobiology of the switch process by analyzing switch rates for antidepressants that target different neurotransmitter systems (for an excellent and extensive recent review of this topic, see Licht et al5). Below, we review what is known about the various classes of antidepressants and their propensity to cause TEAS in individuals with bipolar disorder.

TEAS Associated With the Use of Various Classes of Antidepressants

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) have consistently been associated with a high risk of TEAS compared to other antidepressants; naturalistic and retrospective studies have reported TEAS incidence rates ranging from 9% to 69%.33–38 Because much of this knowledge has been previously and extensively reviewed by others and is already familiar to the reader,31 we offer here only a brief discussion of the evidence concerning the mood-elevating potential of TCAs; when possible, we also include data from randomized controlled trials in bipolar depression.

Bunney and colleagues35 reviewed 80 studies involving 3,923 patients mostly treated with TCAs for depression and found that the incidence of TEAS into mania or hypomania was 9.5%. A later study by Wehr and Goodwin36 of 26 patients with bipolar I and II disorder found that 18 experienced manic or hypomanic switches while on TCAs after an average of 21 days for those with bipolar I disorder and 35 days for those with bipolar II disorder. Pooled data have similarly shown that mood switches are considerably more frequent with TCAs (11.2%) than with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (3.7%) or placebo (4.2%).33 Bottlender and colleagues37 evaluated the incidence of mania and hypomania in 158 patients with bipolar I disorder treated for depression. They describe switch rates of 34% for patients receiving TCAs. Similar switch rates were reported in a naturalistic study by Boerlin and colleagues,34 who found that both TCAs and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) were associated with higher switch rates than the SSRI fluoxetine (32%, 35%, and 12%, respectively). The TCA imipramine has also been associated with TEAS (rates between 6.6% and 17.8%) in 4 studies.39–42 These rates are considerably lower than those obtained from naturalistic and retrospective studies, but the enrollment of patients with milder forms of bipolar disorder in clinical trials compared to observational/naturalistic studies might explain this difference.

Evidence from a clinical trial in bipolar depression suggests that use of the TCA desipramine, which is a selective inhibitor of norepinephrine reuptake, was associated with a high frequency of switches into mania or hypomania (30%).43 However, no definitive conclusions can be drawn from this study, as few patients were enrolled (n=10); furthermore, there have been no studies evaluating desipramine’s propensity to cause TEAS since 1994. One case report44 noted that reboxetine, another norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (though not available in the United States), induces hypomania.

Only 3 randomized clinical trials have evaluated TEAS in MAOIs. In the first trial,41 3.7% of patients experienced manic/hypomanic symptoms leading to study withdrawal. Also, a YMRS score ≥10 was described in 9.3% of all patients taking moclobemide. In the second study,40 the MAOI tranylcypromine caused manic or hypomanic switches in 11% of patients. Finally, Nolen and colleagues45 reported no manic switches in 8 patients with bipolar disorder openly randomly assigned to tranylcypromine for 10 weeks as an add-on to mood stabilizers. Interestingly, a recent retrospective analysis of Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder data suggests that TEAS is less likely to occur when MAOIs are administered in conjunction with mood stabilizers compared to other classes of antidepressants.22

Bupropion, a norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor (NDRI), is associated with low TEAS potential, and its lower mood-elevating potential compared to TCAs has been described since the 1980s.46,47 Five clinical trials have evaluated its switch-inducing potential in patients with bipolar depression, with a frequency of mood episode switches ranging from 0% to 17.9%.19,25,43,48,49 Notably, all the patients enrolled in bupropion trials were concomitantly treated with mood stabilizers, a factor that may have contributed to the low TEAS rates observed. The highest TEAS rates were reported in the trial with the longest temporal operational criteria for defining TEAS19 (see Table 1).

Two clinical trials have evaluated the switch-inducing potential of the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine, which is a double inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake, in patients with bipolar depression (both bipolar I disorder and bipolar II disorder) and reported TEAS rates ranging between 13.3% and 29%25,50; these rates were higher than TEAS rates reported for the other treatment arms (which used the SSRI paroxetine or sertraline, and the NDRI bupropion), thus suggesting that the perturbation of 2 monoaminergic systems is more likely to induce TEAS than when a single SSRI is used. The study by Post and colleagues25 also showed that different operational criteria are likely to account for the variability in TEAS rates associated with antidepressant treatment across the different trials. In fact, switch rates varied from 15% to 31% for venlafaxine, from 4% to 14% for bupropion, and from 7% to 16% for sertraline, depending on the criteria used to define the switch (a 2-point increase at any point in the trial on the CGI-BP, a CGI-BP manic severity score of at least 3 [ie, at least mildly manic], or a YMRS score above 13 at any visit). In addition, this trial was 1 of the largest to define the study of TEAS as one of its primary aims. The fact that the vast majority of the subjects enrolled in the studies by Post25 and Vieta50 had a diagnosis of bipolar I disorder (73% and 67%, respectively) might explain the apparent discrepancy in these findings; for instance, a recent study51 of patients with bipolar II disorder showed low TEAS rates only for venlafaxine (2.4%), even when it was administered as monotherapy.

Post hoc analyses of data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in bipolar depression usually show low switch rates associated with SSRIs. For example, no TEAS was reported in 2 trials42,52 of fluoxetine in bipolar depression. However, the pooled number of patients who received fluoxetine was low (n=38), and most of the patients came from a study42 that also detected low TEAS rates for the TCA imipramine. Another major limitation of the study was the low completion rate: 43% of the patients randomly assigned to fluoxetine dropped out of the study. Moreover, 18 of these patients (20%) concomitantly received lithium. Another study52 found no difference in mood episode switch between patients randomly assigned to receive either olanzapine (an atypical antipsychotic) plus fluoxetine or placebo. Five patients (15%) participating in this trial were also receiving lithium or valproate. Another study53 that compared the efficacy and TEAS rates for olanzapine monotherapy, placebo, or a combination of olanzapine plus fluoxetine found a TEAS rate of 6% in the latter group; however, this switch rate did not differ from the placebo group. Consistent with these findings, analyses33 of pooled data from databases of pharmaceutical industry research show that mood switches occur in 3.7% of patients treated with SSRIs.

Slightly higher TEAS rates were reported for the SSRI escitalopram in an open study led by Fonseca and colleagues,54 in which 15% (3/20) of the patients who received add-on escitalopram to their current mood stabilizer regimen dropped out of the study because of manic/hypomanic symptoms. Recently, Schaffer and colleagues55 reported that 1 of 10 patients (10%) developed a manic switch during an open-label trial of citalopram added on to mood stabilizers. Similar TEAS rates were described in 2 uncontrolled retrospective studies34,37; Bottlender and colleagues37 reported a switch rate of 12% when SSRIs were administered, despite the inclusion of patients who were currently taking mood stabilizers. Notably, no significant differences in switch rates were found between patients on SSRI monotherapy and patients who took SSRIs as an add-on to mood stabilizers; however, only 8 patients received SSRIs without mood stabilizers.37 The TEAS rate of 12% observed in this study during treatment with SSRIs was higher than the 1 reported from the RCTs42,52,53 described above or from the pooled data33 from pharmaceutical companies, but it is possible that the less stringent inclusion criteria used in these naturalistic/observational studies (eg, inclusion of rapid cyclers, patients with comorbidities) might explain this discrepancy. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that both of these 2 naturalistic studies found a significantly lower rate of TEAS when patients were treated with SSRIs than with TCAs.34,37

Finally, a recent meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials by Gijsman and colleagues32 concluded that available evidence suggests that antidepressants other than TCAs do not induce significantly more TEAS than placebo (4.7% vs 3.8%); however, it is important to note that 75% of the subjects were receiving a concurrent mood stabilizer or atypical antipsychotic. The authors also recommended that TCAs not be used as first-line treatment in patients with bipolar depression, because they were associated with higher switch risk (in that study, 10%). Thus, the evidence suggests that TCAs—for which particularly high switch rates have been described—are more likely to trigger TEAS in patients with bipolar disorder. In contrast, relatively low switch rates have been reported for SSRIs and MAOIs. The data also indirectly suggest that the concomitant perturbation of more than 1 monoaminergic system might carry a higher risk of TEAS.

The Roles of the Serotonergic, Catecholaminergic, Noradrenergic, and Dopaminergic Systems in the Switch Process

As the preceding section emphasized, antidepressants targeting the serotonergic, noradrenergic, and dopaminergic systems have been associated with various degrees of propensity to induce TEAS, providing valuable clues regarding the underlying mechanisms of the switch process.

Data from genetic studies that investigated polymorphisms involved in the homeostasis of the serotonergic system suggest it has a negligible role in the switch process, with 1 exception. Mundo and colleagues9 found that the short allele polymorphism of the serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) was overrepresented in patients who developed treatment-emergent hypomania/mania after receiving SSRIs. However, this association was not confirmed in a subsequent study56 that applied both a broad and a narrow definition of TEAS; failure to replicate the association between the switch pattern and the short variant of the serotonin transporter might be due to higher age at onset in the second study compared to the first. Another study57 investigated other potential candidate genes that regulate serotonergic system homeostasis and switch, such as 5-HTTLPR, 5-HT2A, and tryptophan hydroxylase, but no association was found. Tryptophan depletion, a procedure that depletes serotonin, does not generally cause mood changes in lithium-treated euthymic patients with bipolar disorder,58 while catecholamine depletion evokes a rebound hypomania in patients with bipolar disorder (see below).

The role of the noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems in the switch process is not clearly defined or well studied. Some historical studies tried to investigate the potential role of the noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems in TEAS in bipolar disorder by measuring peripheral metabolites of monoaminergic systems activity. Most of these case reports or case series were carefully conducted with inpatients studied across sequential episodes of switches. With the exception of 3 studies,35,59,60 all other reports described here are single case studies of patients with rapid or ultrarapid cycling. The data summarized here generally refer to drug-free patients, with few exceptions.35,61 Higher urinary cyclic adenosine 3,5 monophosphate,59,62 urinary norepinephrine,35,63,64 and dopamine35,63 have all been associated with mania and, more relevant to the present discussion, the switch to mania. Increased urinary 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol has also been described in this context.60,65 Increased postsynaptic receptor sensitivity interacting with high levels of catecholamines has also been hypothesized to trigger manic switches in some patients with bipolar disorder.60,66

Several genetic polymorphisms in the catecholaminergic system (D4 receptor, D2 receptor, catechol-O-methyltransferase, monoamine oxidase A) have been proposed as putative risk factors for TEAS in bipolar disorder, but no polymorphism was specifically found to be associated with the switch process.57 Interestingly, this study analyzed genetic polymorphisms that had previously been associated with antidepressant response,67 thus suggesting that the process associated with spontaneous switching might have a very different mechanism from that associated with antidepressant response.

Evidence from rodent studies further supports a putative role for the catecholaminergic system in the switch process. Drugs that deplete norepinephrine in the central nervous system (reserpine-like drugs) produce depression-like symptoms (eg, locomotor hypoactivity) in animal models, whereas drugs that increase norepinephrine levels, such as MAOIs and TCAs, are associated with antidepressant-like effects.68 One hypothesis is that these antidepressant-like effects may occur through delayed postsynaptic receptor desensitization, leading to increased receptor responsivity.69 This is theorized to be a critical physiologic protective mechanism against acute and chronic receptor overstimulation that, in turn, might be associated with an increased risk for switching in bipolar disorder. Also, receptor supersensitivity, altered internalization of cell surface receptors, and changes in critical messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression might result in altered monoaminergic activity in the prefrontal areas, leading to manic-like behavioral changes.70

THE GLUTAMATERGIC SYSTEM AND SWITCH

Abundant evidence now implicates glutamatergic system dysfunction in the pathophysiology and treatment of unipolar depression and bipolar disorder (reviewed in Zarate et al71). For instance, animal models of bipolar disorder suggest that the glutamatergic system plays a major role in manic-like behaviors. Du and colleagues72 found that inhibition of glutamate receptor type 1/2 subunit of the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) receptor significantly attenuates amphetamine-induced hyperactivity in rodents. In addition, disruption of glutamate receptor type 6, a subunit of the kainate receptor (kainate receptors, along with AMPA receptors, are glutamatergic non–N-methyl-d-aspartate [NMDA] ionotropic receptors), produces a complex set of symptoms in mice that resemble the behavioral symptoms of mania, including increased risk-taking behaviors and aggressiveness, hyperactivity, and less despair-type manifestations.73 Whether and how these findings might be related to the switch process will need to be addressed in future studies.

Although the study of glutamatergic drugs in the treatment of mood disorders is still in its infancy, preliminary evidence from small trials and case reports suggests that drugs that modulate the glutamatergic system have low risk of inducing TEAS. For example, lamotrigine—a US Food and Drug Administration–approved mood stabilizer that inhibits glutamate release through sodium and calcium channel blockage,74 is not associated with significant risk of switch in patients with bipolar depression.75 In another study76 of 14 patients with bipolar depression, riluzole, another inhibitor of glutamate release, was not associated with increased risk of switching; in that 8-week study, patients received riluzole as an add-on to lithium.

The switch-inducing potential of glutamatergic drugs that act by blocking NMDA receptors (ie, ketamine, memantine) is essentially unknown, as the clinical evidence for their use in bipolar disorder is small.77 Studies in healthy volunteers found that individuals who received intravenously administered ketamine showed significantly more euphoria than those who received amphetamine or placebo,78 possibly indicating some switch-inducing potential. However, it is unclear whether ketamine or memantine elicits core manic symptoms in addition to euphoria in bipolar disorder patients. Clinical trials conducted with these agents have not noted any increased risk of switch associated with their use (see Zarate et al71 for review). While no conclusions can yet be drawn about the propensity of these agents to induce mood switches in bipolar disorder, this is nevertheless an important new avenue of research that will undoubtedly further our understanding of the molecular underpinnings of the switch process.

DOPAMINERGIC AGONISTS (PSYCHOSTIMULANTS) AND SWITCH

Selective dopaminergic drugs, such as psychostimulants, have long been associated with high rates of TEAS and have been empirically tested in preclinical studies. Murphy and colleagues79 studied the effects of l-dopa, and l-dopa+peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor α-methyl dopa hydrazine (MK-485) in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in bipolar depression. Six out of 7 subjects treated with l-dopa developed hypomanic symptoms after an average of 7.8 days. Interestingly, the symptoms decreased within 24–48 hours of discontinuing l-dopa. These results suggest that, at least for some patients, the switch into mania or hypomania is associated with increased functional brain norepinephrine and dopamine.

Similarly, amphetamines that promote dopamine release and inhibit its reuptake have been shown to either precipitate hypomania in patients with bipolar disorder or induce a “hypomanic-like” state in healthy subjects.80,81 Consistent with these findings, a chart review82 of depressed, medically ill patients found several cases of hypomania 1 to 5 days after dextroamphetamine was initiated at doses as low as 5–10 mg/d. Another study found a significant increase in subjective measures of thought processing speed and irritability in healthy volunteers who received 25-mg oral dextroamphetamine, 2 symptoms often associated with mania.80 However, whether amphetamine can trigger other core manic symptoms (eg, grandiosity, aggressive behaviors, pressured speech) has yet to be demonstrated. Amphetamine has been shown to trigger euphoria in healthy volunteers, mostly due to increased dopamine levels in the anteroventral striatum.83 Polymorphisms in the dopamine (DAT1) and norepinephrine (SLC6A2) transporters are known to modulate the mood-elevating effects of amphetamine.84,85

Pharmacologic evidence supports the notion that manipulating the dopaminergic system can mimic the symptoms of bipolar disorder. Investigators have used a catecholamine depletion strategy employing the tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor α-methyl-p-tyrosine (AMPT) in lithium-treated, euthymic patients with bipolar disorder to study the pathophysiology of the disorder.86 Intriguingly, AMPT was not associated with any mood-lowering effects, but was associated with “rebound” hypomanic symptoms. Although preliminary, these results are compatible with the theory of a dysregulated signaling system wherein the compensatory adaptation to catecholamine depletion results in an “overshoot” due to impaired homeostatic mechanisms. Most recently, McTavish and colleagues87 found that a tyrosine-free mixture lowered both subjective and objective measures of the psychostimulant effects of methamphetamine or amphetamine, as well as manic symptom scores. These preliminary findings suggest that decreased tyrosine availability to the brain attenuates pathological increases in dopaminergic neurotransmission following methamphetamine administration and, putatively, in mania.

Evidence from animal models shows that decreased dopaminergic activity and receptor binding in the mesolimbic cortex and nucleus accumbens is associated with depression-like states that can be reversed by diverse antidepressants that potentiate dopaminergic activity.88–91 In contrast, stimulants with dopaminergic properties (such as amphetamine and cocaine), lead to both manic-like effects and increased sensitization in diverse animal models of bipolar disorder.92 Intriguingly, quinpirole, a D2/D3 agonist, induces a biphasic motor activity response, characterized by initial inhibition followed by hyperactivity, which resembles the switch process in bipolar disorder.93,94

Furthermore, psychostimulants exert opposite effects than mood stabilizers on major intracellular signaling cascades, which might also be relevant for the switch process. For example, increased striatal dopaminergic activity—either in dopaminergic transporter knock-out mice or following amphetamine administration—is mediated by the activation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK-3) α and β, whose inhibition is pivotal for the therapeutic actions of lithium and valproate.95 Psychostimulants also activate protein kinase C (PKC), a family of enzymes that have been associated with the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (reviewed in Einat and Manji96). Recent evidence shows that the integrity of the PKC pathway is critical for amphetamine-induced behavioral responses97 and that PKC inhibition has robust antimanic effects in patients with bipolar disorder.98,99

These data are intriguing, as they show converging evidence from clinical and preclinical models regarding the major involvement of the dopaminergic system in mania and mood stabilization. However, whether activation of GSK-3 and PKC pathways is necessary for producing mood switching in patients with bipolar disorder is a topic that requires further investigation.

THE HYPOTHALAMIC-PITUITARY-ADRENAL AXIS AND SWITCH

Since the early 1950s, the administration of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis exogenous hormones has been reported to produce psychiatric symptoms in some patients with no pre-existing psychiatric disorders. In particular, adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisone have been associated with mood elevation.100,101 A review of the literature prior to 1983 reported that the incidence of psychiatric symptoms in patients receiving corticosteroids ranged from 5.7% to 27.6% in uncontrolled studies, and 6.3% to 32% in controlled studies.102 All of these cases were medically ill patients whose onset of psychiatric symptoms occurred within 1 day to several weeks of initiating treatment with glucocorticoids, and most of the patients developed mania/psychosis.103 These psychiatric symptoms were clearly induced in a dose-response fashion, with a higher proportion of manic symptoms occurring in patients who received higher doses (>80 mg/d).104 Recent studies have also confirmed this association between corticosteroid administration and psychiatric symptoms. For example, glucocorticoids elevate mood in patients with multiple sclerosis,105 ophthalmologic diseases,106 asthma,103,107,108 and also in healthy volunteers.109 Notably, higher rates of bipolar disorder–like symptoms were usually associated with a positive personal or family history of psychiatric disorders.107,109

Patients suffering from bipolar disorder are particularly susceptible to developing hypomanic/manic symptoms after receiving steroids. A recent study reviewing clinical charts from patients referred for a psychiatric consultation found 9 patients with bipolar disorder whose psychiatric symptoms were precipitated by the use of corticosteroids (prednisone, betamethasone, methylprednisolone); 7 of the 9 (77%) rapidly developed manic/hypomanic symptoms.110 Patients with bipolar disorder using a beclomethasone inhaler,111,112 as well as those using the androgen hormone dehydroepiandrosterone,113 also developed mania. In addition, the single administration of triamcinolone in a celiac plexus block produced manic episodes in 2 patients with bipolar disorder,114 confirming that susceptible patients can develop manic symptoms after the administration of even a single dose of glucocorticoids, and within a short period of time.114 This relationship between the administration of glucocorticoids and the switch process is more striking when one considers that the administration of prednisone 40–60 mg on alternate days (in an on-off fashion) induced rapid-cycling symptoms in 3 patients.115 These patients developed manic symptoms on the days they received prednisone; the opposite—a relapse into depression—occurred on the days they did not receive the drug.

In addition, hyperactivity of the HPA axis is 1 of the most replicated biologic finding in major depression. Although the evidence for HPA dysfunction in bipolar disorder is not as well validated, several authors have reported abnormalities in urinary and cerebrospinal fluid cortisol levels and decreased dexamethasone test suppression in patients with bipolar disorder (see Daban et al116 for a review). In contrast, this finding is not observed in pure mania.117,118 However, this association does not necessarily implicate a causal relationship, as HPA axis hyperactivity might be an epiphenomenon of mounting mood elevation.

Converging evidence from small studies with rapid cyclers or ultrarapid cyclers in patients with bipolar disorder suggest that HPA hyperactivity is critical for the switch from mania to depression in most of these patients63,119–121; however, the role of the HPA axis in switching from depression to mania is more controversial. Notably, transgenic mice overexpressing glucocorticoid receptors in the forebrain displayed enhanced depressive-like behaviors and increased sensitization to cocaine and antidepressants.122 They also had a wider range of reactivity to stimuli that trigger both negative and positive emotional responses, which might be relevant for the neurobiology of the switch process in bipolar disorder. Findings from other rodent studies, albeit not always consistent, further support the role of glucocorticoid receptors in affective-like behaviors (reviewed in Einat and Manji96).

SLEEP DEPRIVATION AND SWITCH

Sleep deprivation has historically been proposed as a final common pathway prior to the onset of mania, and it can be triggered by diverse environmental, psychological, interpersonal, or pharmacologic factors associated with the onset of mania.123 Studies have consistently shown that sleep deprivation produces an acute antidepressant response in as many as 80% of subjects with bipolar depression and 60% of patients with unipolar depression.124 Spontaneous switch rates after sleep deprivation vary from 10%125 to 30%123,126 across studies, and this wide range is likely due to sample heterogeneity and the different treatment status of the patients. The fact that sleep deprivation acts quickly makes it an ideal tool to study the molecular basis of the switch process. However, it remains unclear why sleep deprivation causes temporary recovery in some patients but triggers manic switches in others and whether these 2 phenomena share the same neurobiological mechanism.

Sleep deprivation produces several behaviors in rats that suggest it may be a useful model for mania, including insomnia, hyperactivity, irritability,127,128 aggressive behavior,129 novelty seeking preference,130 and hypersexuality.131 Moreover, rats exposed to serial sleep deprivation display behavioral sensitization, with worse manic-like symptoms emerging over repetition of the procedure, which parallels clinical findings of increased severity of illness over cumulative relapses in patients with bipolar disorder.132 Sleep deprivation induces few effects at adrenergic or serotonergic receptors,133 but it directly regulates brain dopaminergic receptor sensitivity.134 Increased plasma norepinephrine and norepinephrine metabolites have also been found in responders to sleep deprivation.135,136 Decreased 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol levels have also been found in the cerebrospinal fluid of sleep deprivation responders compared to nonresponders.137,138 More recent studies have demonstrated that the expression of selected critical genes varies dramatically during sleep and waking,139 which likely plays a major role in regulating long-term neuroplastic events related to the antidepressant effects of sleep deprivation. A number of mRNA differential display, microarray, and biochemical studies have also shown that short-term sleep deprivation is associated with both increased phosphorylated cyclic AMP response element-binding protein levels (pCREB, the active form of this transcription factor) and increased expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (and its receptor tyrosine kinase B [TrkB]) (reviewed in Tononi and Cirelli140).

In an extension of these gene expression studies, Cirelli and Tononi139 hypothesized that the level of activity of the neuromodulatory noradrenergic and serotonergic systems is a key factor in the induction of plasticity genes. Both of these systems project diffusely in the brain, where they regulate gene expression, and are quiescent only during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. To delineate the putative roles of the noradrenergic and serotonergic projections in regulating the expression of plasticity genes, a series of lesioning studies was undertaken. These studies showed that the expression of these molecules was regulated by the noradrenergic system, and that lesions in the locus ceruleus abolished the up-regulation of their expression. In contrast, lesions of the serotonergic system had no effect on the level of expression of these genes (reviewed in Payne et al141), thus implying a negligible role for the serotonergic system in the neurobiology of response to sleep deprivation.

It has been suggested that sleep deprivation may bring about its rapid antidepressant effects by activating the locus ceruleus noradrenergic system at a time when it would normally be quiescent (ie, during periods of REM sleep at night). This would then allow the interaction of released norepinephrine with a primed, sensitized postsynaptic milieu in critical circuits, resulting in the rapid and robust expression of plasticity genes such as cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB), BDNF, and TrkB and, consequently, a rapid antidepressant response, as well as a switch into mania/hypomania.141 Notably, an early case report by Gillin and colleagues142 documented nocturnal electroencephalogram recordings in a rapid-cycling patient who experienced 4 manic switches while asleep and showed that on every occasion the last sleep stage recorded was REM; a possible role of increased locus ceruleus firing rate during REM was hypothesized as 1 of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the switch process.

Supporting the importance of neuroplasticity in manic-like behaviors, studies have shown that BDNF gene mutations are associated with increased spontaneous locomotion and aggression in response to acute amphetamine and chronic cocaine in rodents, symptoms that often characterize manic episodes.143

OTHER NEUROBIOLOGICAL FACTORS IMPLICATED IN THE SWITCH PROCESS: ROLE OF CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS

Observational studies conducted as early as the 1970s hypothesized that a disruption in circadian rhythms in bipolar disorder was a core feature of this illness. For example, an early report of patients hospitalized at the National Institute of Mental Health showed that switches into mania were more likely to happen in the morning than at night, suggesting a possible role for circadian factors in this process.144 Marked alterations in body temperature, sleep patterns, cortisol secretion, thyroid-stimulating hormone secretion, and motor activity have been described during episodes of bipolar disorder (reviewed in Hasler et al7). Increased motor activity and decreased REM sleep, in particular, were found to strongly predict an imminent manic switch.35,59,64 According to some researchers,123 sleep loss might be the final common pathway triggering switches into mania. According to this model, the interaction between sleep reduction and a sleep-sensitive circadian phase interval could promote switches from depression. However, sleep disruption might also be the sign that the manic process is already mounting, rather than the specific trigger.

Both genetic and environmental factors might act as susceptibility factors through circadian rhythm regulation, increasing the desynchronization between the central pacemaker (ie, the suprachiasmatic nucleus) and other internal oscillators. Increased external desynchronization between the timing of body rhythms and the light-dark cycle has been also hypothesized as a predisposing factor for mood episodes.145 Interestingly, different mood stabilizers modulate the circadian clock, controlling the expression of genes involved in circadian rhythm regulation. For example, the mood stabilizer lithium inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3), and through this mechanism increases circadian period length.7,146 Studies conducted in Drosophila have shown that the ortholog of GSK-3, a protein called SHAGGY, is an important regulator of circadian cycles.7 However, studies that have investigated GSK-3 polymorphisms as a putative susceptibility gene for bipolar disorder have produced conflicting results.147–149

The CLOCK gene is another major determinant of circadian cycles and might be involved in the switch to mania in patients with bipolar disorder; indeed, such evidence has arisen in animal models of bipolar disorder.150 Disruption of the CLOCK gene produces manic-like behaviors in mice, such as hyperactivity, increased reward-value for cocaine and sucrose, and medial forebrain bundle stimulation.150 In humans, CLOCK gene polymorphisms were shown to be associated with illness recurrence but not with diurnal variation in individuals with bipolar disorder.8 Thus, it appears that polymorphisms in genes that regulate the circadian clock (eg, CLOCK), along with sleep disruption and consequent increase in neuroplastic factor expression (pCREB, TrkB, BDNF) might have a substantial impact on mood destabilization leading to manic switch.

CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Despite the fact that the switch phenomenon is a core aspect of the clinical presentation of bipolar disorder, as well as fundamentally relevant to its therapeutics, it is still poorly understood. The studies conducted on this issue are unfortunately associated with several methodological limitations and are often retrospective in nature or the result of secondary analyses. For example, different definitions of TEAS have been used throughout these studies and may produce dramatically different results in terms of both clinical and biologic findings. In order for a systematic study of this topic to be successful, the criteria and threshold of rating scales used will need to be uniform across studies. Agreement is also needed regarding how long after the beginning of drug treatment a manic episode should be considered as TEAS. Another major limitation in our understanding of the switch process is the lack of appropriate animal models for manic behaviors; preliminary evidence linking glutamate receptor abnormalities with manic-like behaviors in rodents73 are encouraging in this sense and might provide new evidence about the role of the glutamatergic system in the switch process.

For these reasons, results from clinical trials that have investigated the switch potential of different classes of antidepressants are difficult to interpret and subject to controversy among researchers. Even considering these caveats, it appears that drugs that “perturbate” more than 1 monoaminergic system, such as TCAs and, possibly, venlafaxine, confer a higher risk for TEAS than SSRIs or other second-generation antidepressants. A putative role for the monoaminergic system in the switch process has been suggested by clinical35,64 and preclinical studies140 but needs further systematic investigation. Increased catecholamine levels lead to up-regulation of factors involved in neuroplasticity cascades and to increased postsynaptic receptor sensitivity, which might ultimately increase the liability to switch (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Click figure to enlarge

Other pharmacologic and somatic interventions reviewed here include exogenous corticosteroids, dopaminergic agonists, and sleep deprivation. These interventions are particularly interesting because, in contrast to antidepressants, when they do induce switch, it generally occurs within a short time frame and is seen even in healthy volunteers. Also potentially relevant to the switch process are data from preclinical studies linking the HPA axis, the dopaminergic system, and sleep deprivation to intracellular signaling pathways that have been extensively investigated in bipolar disorder, as well as in the mechanisms of action of mood stabilizers; these include BDNF, GSK-3, and PKC cascades. Other factors that have been linked to this complex phenomenon include abnormal glutamatergic transmission and circadian rhythm instability.

To date, the most convincing evidence suggests that BDNF may play a major role in the switch process, as suggested by preclinical models of the antidepressant effects of sleep deprivation. Human genetic studies further suggest that BDNF plays a key role in bipolar disorder and, perhaps, switch.151 For instance, a valine(66) methionine variant associated with increased BDNF stimulated release in vitro,152 was found to be excessively transmitted in patients with bipolar disorder,153 and was associated with earlier age at onset.154 These preliminary data raise the intriguing possibility that individuals with bipolar disorder with the val/val BDNF genotype may be at greater risk for spontaneous and antidepressant- or sleep deprivation–induced switches into mania. However, future studies are clearly needed to investigate this possibility. Furthermore, BDNF has been already implicated in other facets of bipolar disorder, including rapid cycling,155 response to lithium,156 and suicidality.157 Figure 1 highlights the factors and pathways that may be putative determinants of the switch process and warrant further study.

In summary, there is a clear need to refine our understanding of the neurobiology of the switch process. Research with patients who experience mood switching during the course of clinical trials in bipolar disorder is not likely to be very informative in terms of understanding the neurobiology involved in this process, given the relatively rare occurrence of switch, the time until a switch occurs, and the multiple confounding factors associated with such investigations. In order to better understand the neurobiology of the switch process, it might be more illuminating to investigate interventions that more consistently produce switch, typically within a short period of time, such as sleep deprivation. In addition, the phenomenon could be studied in distinct groups, such as healthy subjects receiving switch-inducing interventions and individuals with bipolar disorder not receiving concomitant medications. Furthermore, a large sample size would allow investigating whether healthy subjects or individuals with bipolar disorder with certain “risk polymorphisms” (eg, homozygous subjects for the BDNF Val66 allele or with certain CLOCK genetic variants) have a higher risk of switch compared to those without this vulnerability. Such group comparisons would also permit the systematic evaluation of neurobiological factors associated with switching (eg, plasma catecholamines and hormones, sleep parameters, brain imaging data). Finally, preclinical studies conducted in appropriate animal models might provide important hints about the molecular and cellular mechanisms of this understudied but key phenomenon.

Drug names: amphetamine (Adderall and others), beclomethasone (Qvar and Beconase), betamethasone (Celestone, Diprolene, and others), bupropion (Aplenzin, Wellbutrin, and others), citalopram (Celexa and others), desipramine (Norpramin and others), dexamethasone (Ozurdex, Maxidex, and others), dextroamphetamine (Dexedrine and others), escitalopram (Lexapro and others), fluoxetine (Prozac, Sarafem, and others), imipramine (Tofranil and others), ketamine (Ketalar and others), lamotrigine (Lamictal and others), lithium (Eskalith, Lithobid, and others), memantine (Namenda), methamphetamine (Desoxyn), methylprednisolone (Medrol, Depo-medrol, and others), olanzapine (Zyprexa), paroxetine (Paxil, Pexeva, and others), riluzole (Rilutek and others), sertraline (Zoloft and others), tranylcypromine (Parnate and others), triamcinolone (Azmacort, Kenalog, and others), tyrosine (Demser), venlafaxine (Effexor and others).

Author affiliations: Experimental Therapeutics, Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Drs Salvadore, Machado-Vieira, and Zarate and Ms Henter); Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Titusville, New Jersey (Dr Manji); and Roche Pharmaceuticals, New York, New York (Dr Quiroz).

Potential conflicts of interest: Dr Quiroz is an employee of Roche Pharmaceuticals and a former employee of Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research. Dr Manji is an employee of Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research. Drs Salvadore, Machado-Vieira, and Zarate and Ms. Henter report no potential conflicts of interest.

Funding/support: This study was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health (Bethesda, Maryland) and a NARSAD Award (Dr Zarate).

REFERENCES

1. Falret J. Mémoire sur la folie circulaire, forme de maladie mentale caractérisée par la reproduction sucessive et réguliäre de l’état maniqaue, de l’état mélancolique, et d’un intervalle lucide plus or moins prolongé. Bull Acad Natl Med. 1854;19:382–415.

2. Sedler MJ. Falret’s discovery: the origin of the concept of bipolar affective illness. Sedler MJ, Dessain EC, trans. Am J Psychiatry. 1983;140(9):1127–1133. PubMed

3. Angst J, Sellaro R. Historical perspectives and natural history of bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;48(6):445–457. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00909-4 PubMed

4. Angst J. Switch from depression to mania, or from mania to depression: role of psychotropic drugs. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1987;23(1):66–67. PubMed

5. Licht RW, Gijsman H, Nolen WA, et al. Are antidepressants safe in the treatment of bipolar depression? a critical evaluation of their potential risk to induce switch into mania or cycle acceleration. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008;118(5):337–346.doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01237.x PubMed

6. Grunze HC. Switching, induction of rapid cycling, and increased suicidality with antidepressants in bipolar patients: fact or overinterpretation? CNS Spectr. 2008;13(9):790–795. PubMed

7. Hasler G, Drevets WC, Gould TD, et al. Toward constructing an endophenotype strategy for bipolar disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60(2):93–105. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.11.006 PubMed

8. Benedetti F, Serretti A, Colombo C, et al. Influence of CLOCK gene polymorphism on circadian mood fluctuation and illness recurrence in bipolar depression. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2003;123B(1):23–26. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.20038 PubMed

9. Mundo E, Walker M, Cate T, et al. The role of serotonin transporter protein gene in antidepressant-induced mania in bipolar disorder: preliminary findings. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(6):539–544. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.6.539 PubMed

10. Vieta E, Angst J, Reed C, et al. EMBLEM advisory board. Predictors of switching from mania to depression in a large observational study across Europe (EMBLEM). J Affect Disord. 2009;118(1-3):118–123. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.02.007 PubMed

11. MacKinnon DF, Zandi PP, Gershon ES, et al. Association of rapid mood switching with panic disorder and familial panic risk in familial bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(9):1696–1698. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.9.1696 PubMed

12. MacKinnon DF, Zandi PP, Gershon E, et al. Rapid switching of mood in families with multiple cases of bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(9):921–928. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.921 PubMed

13. MacKinnon DF, Potash JB, McMahon FJ, et al. National Institutes of Mental Health Bipolar Disorder Genetics Initiative. Rapid mood switching and suicidality in familial bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2005;7(5):441–448. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2005.00236.x PubMed

14. Maj M, Pirozzi R, Magliano L, et al. The prognostic significance of “switching” in patients with bipolar disorder: a 10-year prospective follow-up study. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(10):1711–1717. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1711 PubMed

15. Altshuler LL, Post RM, Leverich GS, et al. Antidepressant-induced mania and cycle acceleration: a controversy revisited. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152(8):1130–1138. PubMed

16. Post RM. Kindling and sensitization as models for affective episode recurrence, cyclicity, and tolerance phenomena. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31(6):858–873. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.003 PubMed

17. Bottlender R, Sato T, Kleindienst N, et al. Mixed depressive features predict maniform switch during treatment of depression in bipolar I disorder. J Affect Disord. 2004;78(2):149–152. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00265-3 PubMed

18. Zarate CA Jr, Tohen M, Fletcher K. Cycling into depression from a first episode of mania: a case-comparison study. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(9):1524–1526. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.9.1524 PubMed

19. Sachs GS, Nierenberg AA, Calabrese JR, et al. Effectiveness of adjunctive antidepressant treatment for bipolar depression. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(17):1711–1722. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa064135 PubMed

20. Serretti A, Artioli P, Zanardi R, et al. Clinical features of antidepressant associated manic and hypomanic switches in bipolar disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2003;27(5):751–757. doi:10.1016/S0278-5846(03)00104-0 PubMed

21. Henry C, Sorbara F, Lacoste J, et al. Antidepressant-induced mania in bipolar patients: identification of risk factors. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(4):249–255. PubMed

22. Truman CJ, Goldberg JF, Ghaemi SN, et al. Self-reported history of manic/hypomanic switch associated with antidepressant use: data from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD). J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68(10):1472–1479. doi:10.4088/JCP.v68n1002 PubMed

23. Carlson GA, Finch SJ, Fochtmann LJ, et al. Antidepressant-associated switches from depression to mania in severe bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2007;9(8):851–859. PubMed

24. Tamada RS, Issler CK, Amaral JA, et al. Treatment emergent affective switch: a controlled study. Bipolar Disord. 2004;6(4):333–337. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00124.x PubMed

25. Post RM, Altshuler LL, Leverich GS, et al. Mood switch in bipolar depression: comparison of adjunctive venlafaxine, bupropion and sertraline. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189(2):124–131. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.105.013045 PubMed

26. El-Mallakh RS, Ghaemi SN, Sagduyu K, et al. STEP-BD Investigators. Antidepressant-associated chronic irritable dysphoria (ACID) in STEP-BD patients. J Affect Disord. 2008;111(2–3):372–377. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2008.03.025 PubMed

27. Altshuler LL, Suppes T, Black DO, et al. Lower switch rate in depressed patients with bipolar II than bipolar I disorder treated adjunctively with second-generation antidepressants. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(2):313–315. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.2.313 PubMed

28. Bauer M, Rasgon N, Grof P, et al. Do antidepressants influence mood patterns? a naturalistic study in bipolar disorder. Eur Psychiatry. 2006;21(4):262–269. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.04.009 PubMed

29. Bond DJ, Noronha MM, Kauer-Sant’Anna M, et al. Antidepressant-associated mood elevations in bipolar II disorder compared with bipolar I disorder and major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(10):1589–1601. doi:10.4088/JCP.v69n1009 PubMed

30. Ghaemi SN, Goodwin FK. Antidepressants for bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(8):1545–1546, author reply 1547–1548. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1545-a PubMed

31. Salvi VFA, Fagiolini A, Swartz HA, et al. The use of antidepressants in bipolar disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(8):1307–1318. doi:10.4088/JCP.v69n0816 PubMed

32. Gijsman HJ, Geddes JR, Rendell JM, et al. Antidepressants for bipolar depression: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(9):1537–1547. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1537 PubMed

33. Peet M. Induction of mania with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants. Br J Psychiatry. 1994;164(4):549–550. doi:10.1192/bjp.164.4.549 PubMed

34. Boerlin HL, Gitlin MJ, Zoellner LA, et al. Bipolar depression and antidepressant-induced mania: a naturalistic study. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59(7):374–379. PubMed

35. Bunney WE Jr, Murphy DL, Goodwin FK, et al. The switch process from depression to mania: relationship to drugs which alter brain amines. Lancet. 1970;1(7655):1022–1027. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(70)91151-7 PubMed

36. Wehr TA, Goodwin FK. Rapid cycling in manic-depressives induced by tricyclic antidepressants. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979;36(5):555–559. PubMed

37. Bottlender R, Rudolf D, Strauss A, et al. Mood-stabilisers reduce the risk of developing antidepressant-induced maniform states in acute treatment of bipolar I depressed patients. J Affect Disord. 2001;63(1–3):79–83. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00172-5 PubMed

38. Lewis JL, Winokur G. The induction of mania: a natural history study with controls. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39(3):303–306. PubMed

39. Nemeroff CB, Evans DL, Gyulai L, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of imipramine and paroxetine in the treatment of bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(6):906–912. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.906 PubMed

40. Himmelhoch JM, Thase ME, Mallinger AG, et al. Tranylcypromine versus imipramine in anergic bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148(7):910–916. PubMed

41. Silverstone T. Moclobemide vs imipramine in bipolar depression: a multicentre double-blind clinical trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2001;104(2):104–109. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00240.x PubMed

42. Cohn JB, Collins G, Ashbrook E, et al. A comparison of fluoxetine imipramine and placebo in patients with bipolar depressive disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1989;4(4):313–322. doi:10.1097/00004850-198910000-00006 PubMed

43. Sachs GS, Lafer B, Stoll AL, et al. A double-blind trial of bupropion versus desipramine for bipolar depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 1994;55(9):391–393. PubMed

44. Vieta E, Colom F, Martínez-Arán A, et al. Reboxetine-induced hypomania. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001;62(8):655–656. PubMed

45. Nolen WA, Kupka RW, Hellemann G, et al. Tranylcypromine vs lamotrigine in the treatment of refractory bipolar depression: a failed but clinically useful study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007;115(5):360–365. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2007.00993.x PubMed

46. Wright G, Galloway L, Kim J, et al. Bupropion in the long-term treatment of cyclic mood disorders: mood stabilizing effects. J Clin Psychiatry. 1985;46(1):22–25. PubMed

47. Shopsin B. Bupropion’s prophylactic efficacy in bipolar affective illness. J Clin Psychiatry. 1983;44(5 Pt 2):163–169. PubMed

48. McIntyre RS, Mancini DA, McCann S, et al. Topiramate versus bupropion SR when added to mood stabilizer therapy for the depressive phase of bipolar disorder: a preliminary single-blind study. Bipolar Disord. 2002;4(3):207–213. doi:10.1034/j.1399-5618.2002.01189.x PubMed

49. Joffe RT, MacQueen GM, Marriott M, et al. Induction of mania and cycle acceleration in bipolar disorder: effect of different classes of antidepressant. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2002;105(6):427–430. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.02360.x PubMed

50. Vieta E, Martinez-Arán A, Goikolea JM, et al. A randomized trial comparing paroxetine and venlafaxine in the treatment of bipolar depressed patients taking mood stabilizers. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63(6):508–512. PubMed

51. Amsterdam JD, Shults J. Comparison of short-term venlafaxine versus lithium monotherapy for bipolar II major depressive episode: a randomized open-label study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;28(2):171–181. doi:10.1097/JCP.0b013e318166c4e6 PubMed

52. Amsterdam JD, Shults J. Comparison of fluoxetine, olanzapine, and combined fluoxetine plus olanzapine initial therapy of bipolar type I and type II major depression—lack of manic induction. J Affect Disord. 2005;87(1):121–130. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2005.02.018 PubMed

53. Tohen M, Vieta E, Calabrese J, et al. Efficacy of olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination in the treatment of bipolar I depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(11):1079–1088. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.11.1079 PubMed

54. Fonseca M, Soares JC, Hatch JP, et al. An open trial of adjunctive escitalopram in bipolar depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(1):81–86. doi:10.4088/JCP.v67n0115 PubMed

55. Schaffer A, Zuker P, Levitt A. Randomized, double-blind pilot trial comparing lamotrigine versus citalopram for the treatment of bipolar depression. J Affect Disord. 2006;96(1–2):95–99. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2006.05.023 PubMed

56. Rousseva A, Henry C, van den Bulke D, et al. Antidepressant-induced mania, rapid cycling and the serotonin transporter gene polymorphism. Pharmacogenomics J. 2003;3(2):101–104. doi:10.1038/sj.tpj.6500156 PubMed

57. Serretti A, Artioli P, Zanardi R, et al. Genetic features of antidepressant induced mania and hypo-mania in bipolar disorder. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004;174(4):504–511. doi:10.1007/s00213-004-1948-x PubMed

58. Hughes JH, Dunne F, Young AH. Effects of acute tryptophan depletion on mood and suicidal ideation in bipolar patients symptomatically stable on lithium. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;177(5):447–451. doi:10.1192/bjp.177.5.447 PubMed

59. Bunney WE Jr, Goodwin FK, Murphy DL, et al. The “switch process” in manic-depressive illness, II: relationship to catecholamines, REM sleep, and drugs. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972;27(3):304–309. PubMed

60. Zis AP, Cowdry RW, Wehr TA, et al. Tricyclic-induced mania and MHPG excretion. Psychiatry Res. 1979;1(1):93–99. doi:10.1016/0165-1781(79)90033-7 PubMed

61. Joyce PR, Fergusson DM, Woollard G, et al. Urinary catecholamines and plasma hormones predict mood state in rapid cycling bipolar affective disorder. J Affect Disord. 1995;33(4):233–243. doi:10.1016/0165-0327(94)00094-P PubMed

62. Paul MI, Cramer H, Bunney WE Jr. Urinary adenosine 3,5-monophosphate in the switch process from depression to mania. Science. 1971;171(968):300–303. doi:10.1126/science.171.3968.300 PubMed

63. Juckel G, Hegerl U, Mavrogiorgou P, et al. Clinical and biological findings in a case with 48-hour bipolar ultrarapid cycling before and during valproate treatment. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61(8):585–593. PubMed

64. Post RM, Stoddard FJ, Gillin JC, et al. Alterations in motor activity, sleep, and biochemistry in a cycling manic-depressive patient. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1977;34(4):470–477. PubMed

65. Jones FD, Maas JW, Dekirmenjian H, et al. Urinary catecholamine metabolites during behavioral changes in a patient with manic-depressive cycles. Science. 1973;179(70):300–302. doi:10.1126/science.179.4070.300 PubMed

66. Bunney WE Jr, Goodwin FK, Murphy DL. The “switch process” in manic-depressive illness, 3: theoretical implications. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972;27(3):312–317. PubMed

67. Serretti A, Lilli R, Smeraldi E. Pharmacogenetics in affective disorders. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002;438(3):117–128. doi:10.1016/S0014-2999(02)01309-2 PubMed

68. Pryor JC, Sulser F. Evolution of monoamine hypotheses of depression. In: Horton RW, Katona C, eds. Biological Aspects of Affective Disorders. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press; 1991:77–94.

69. de Montigny C, Chaput Y, Blier P. Modification of serotonergic neuron properties by long-term treatment with serotonin reuptake blockers. J Clin Psychiatry. 1990;51(suppl B):4–8. PubMed

70. Butkerait P, Wang HY, Friedman E. Increases in guanine nucleotide binding to striatal G proteins is associated with dopamine receptor supersensitivity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994;271(1):422–428. PubMed

71. Zarate CA Jr, Singh J, Manji HK. Cellular plasticity cascades: targets for the development of novel therapeutics for bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59(11):1006–1020. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.021 PubMed

72. Du J, Creson TK, Wu LJ, et al. The role of hippocampal GluR1 and GluR2 receptors in manic-like behavior. J Neurosci. 2008;28(1):68–79. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3080-07.2008 PubMed

73. Shaltiel G, Maeng S, Malkesman O, et al. Evidence for the involvement of the kainate receptor subunit GluR6 (GRIK2) in mediating behavioral displays related to behavioral symptoms of mania. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13(9):858–872. doi:10.1038/mp.2008.20 PubMed

74. Ketter TA, Manji HK, Post RM. Potential mechanisms of action of lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar disorders. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003;23(5):484–495. doi:10.1097/01.jcp.0000088915.02635.e8 PubMed

75. Calabrese JR, Rapport DJ, Kimmel SE, et al. Controlled trials in bipolar I depression: focus on switch rates and efficacy. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1999;9(suppl 4):S109–S112. doi:10.1016/S0924-977X(99)00023-1 PubMed

76. Zarate CA Jr, Quiroz JA, Singh JB, et al. An open-label trial of the glutamate-modulating agent riluzole in combination with lithium for the treatment of bipolar depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57(4):430–432. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.023 PubMed

77. Teng CT, Demetrio FN. Memantine may acutely improve cognition and have a mood stabilizing effect in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2006;28(3):252–254. doi:10.1590/S1516-44462006000300020 PubMed

78. Krystal JH, Perry EB Jr, Gueorguieva R, et al. Comparative and interactive human psychopharmacologic effects of ketamine and amphetamine: implications for glutamatergic and dopaminergic model psychoses and cognitive function. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(9):985–994. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.9.985 PubMed

79. Murphy DL, Brodie HK, Goodwin FK, et al. Regular induction of hypomania by L-dopa in “bipolar” manic-depressive patients. Nature. 1971;229(5280):135–136. doi:10.1038/229135a0 PubMed

80. Asghar SJ, Tanay VA, Baker GB, et al. Relationship of plasma amphetamine levels to physiological, subjective, cognitive and biochemical measures in healthy volunteers. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2003;18(4):291–299. doi:10.1002/hup.480 PubMed

81. Jacobs D, Silverstone T. Dextroamphetamine-induced arousal in human subjects as a model for mania. Psychol Med. 1986;16(2):323–329. doi:10.1017/S0033291700009132 PubMed

82. Masand PS, Pickett P, Murray GB. Hypomania precipitated by psychostimulant use in depressed medically ill patients. Psychosomatics. 1995;36(2):145–147. PubMed

83. Drevets WC, Gautier C, Price JC, et al. Amphetamine-induced dopamine release in human ventral striatum correlates with euphoria. Biol Psychiatry. 2001;49(2):81–96. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(00)01038-6 PubMed

84. Dlugos A, Freitag C, Hohoff C, et al. Norepinephrine transporter gene variation modulates acute response to D-amphetamine. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;61(11):1296–1305. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.031 PubMed

85. Lott DC, Kim SJ, Cook EH Jr, et al. Dopamine transporter gene associated with diminished subjective response to amphetamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005;30(3):602–609. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300637 PubMed

86. Anand A, Darnell A, Miller HL, et al. Effect of catecholamine depletion on lithium-induced long-term remission of bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;45(8):972–978. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00293-5 PubMed

87. McTavish SF, McPherson MH, Harmer CJ, et al. Antidopaminergic effects of dietary tyrosine depletion in healthy subjects and patients with manic illness. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;179(4):356–360. doi:10.1192/bjp.179.4.356 PubMed

88. D’Aquila PS, Peana AT, Panin F, et al. Reversal of antidepressant-induced dopaminergic behavioural supersensitivity after long-term chronic imipramine withdrawal. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003;458(1–2):129–134. doi:10.1016/S0014-2999(02)02731-0 PubMed

89. Ichikawa J, Meltzer HY. Effect of antidepressants on striatal and accumbens extracellular dopamine levels. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995;281(3):255–261. doi:10.1016/0014-2999(95)00264-L PubMed

90. Papp M, Klimek V, Willner P. Parallel changes in dopamine D2 receptor binding in limbic forebrain associated with chronic mild stress-induced anhedonia and its reversal by imipramine. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994;115(4):441–446. doi:10.1007/BF02245566 PubMed

91. Anisman H, Irwin J, Sklar LS. Deficits of escape performance following catecholamine depletion: implications for behavioral deficits induced by uncontrollable stress. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1979;64(2):163–170. doi:10.1007/BF00496057 PubMed

92. Machado-Vieira R, Kapczinski F, Soares JC. Perspectives for the development of animal models of bipolar disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2004;28(2):209–224. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2003.10.015 PubMed

93. Shaldubina A, Einat H, Szechtman H, et al. Preliminary evaluation of oral anticonvulsant treatment in the quinpirole model of bipolar disorder. J Neural Transm. 2002;109(3):433–440. doi:10.1007/s007020200035 PubMed

94. Eilam D, Szechtman H. Biphasic effect of D-2 agonist quinpirole on locomotion and movements. Eur J Pharmacol. 1989;161(2–3):151–157. doi:10.1016/0014-2999(89)90837-6 PubMed

95. Beaulieu JM, Sotnikova TD, Yao WD, et al. Lithium antagonizes dopamine-dependent behaviors mediated by an AKT/glycogen synthase kinase 3 signaling cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(14):5099–5104. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307921101 PubMed

96. Einat H, Manji HK. Cellular plasticity cascades: genes-to-behavior pathways in animal models of bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59(12):1160–1171. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.11.004 PubMed

97. Chen R, Furman CA, Zhang M, et al. Protein kinase C beta is a critical regulator of dopamine transporter trafficking and regulates the behavioral response to amphetamine in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009;328(3):912–920.

98. Yildiz A, Guleryuz S, Ankerst DP, et al. Protein kinase C inhibition in the treatment of mania: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tamoxifen. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(3):255–263. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.43 PubMed

99. Zarate CA Jr, Singh JB, Carlson PJ, et al. Efficacy of a protein kinase C inhibitor (tamoxifen) in the treatment of acute mania: a pilot study. Bipolar Disord. 2007;9(6):561–570. doi:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00530.x PubMed

100. Ritchie EA. Toxic psychosis under cortisone and corticotrophin. J Ment Sci. 1956;102(429):830–837. PubMed

101. Clark LD, Quarton GC, Cobb S, et al. Further observations on mental disturbances associated with cortisone and ACTH therapy. N Engl J Med. 1953;249(5):178–183. PubMed

102. Lewis DA, Smith RE. Steroid-induced psychiatric syndromes. A report of 14 cases and a review of the literature. J Affect Disord. 1983;5(4):319–332. doi:10.1016/0165-0327(83)90022-8 PubMed

103. Lewis LD, Cochrane GM. Psychosis in a child inhaling budesonide. Lancet. 1983;2(8350):634. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(83)90725-0 PubMed

104. Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program. Acute adverse reactions to prednisone in relation to dosage. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1972;13(5):694–698. PubMed

105. Minden SL, Orav J, Schildkraut JJ. Hypomanic reactions to ACTH and prednisone treatment for multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 1988;38(10):1631–1634. PubMed

106. Naber D, Sand P, Heigl B. Psychopathological and neuropsychological effects of 8-days’ corticosteroid treatment. A prospective study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1996;21(1):25–31. doi:10.1016/0306-4530(95)00031-3 PubMed

107. Brown ES, Suppes T, Khan DA, et al. Mood changes during prednisone bursts in outpatients with asthma. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002;22(1):55–61. doi:10.1097/00004714-200202000-00009 PubMed

108. Türktaş L, Gücüyener K, Ozden A. Medication-induced psychotic reaction. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36(8):1017–1018. PubMed doi:10.1097/00004583-199708000-00006

109. Wolkowitz OM, Rubinow D, Doran AR, et al. Prednisone effects on neurochemistry and behavior. Preliminary findings. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990;47(10):963–968. PubMed

110. Wada K, Yamada N, Suzuki H, et al. Recurrent cases of corticosteroid-induced mood disorder: clinical characteristics and treatment. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61(4):261–267. PubMed

111. Phelan MC. Beclomethasone mania. Br J Psychiatry. 1989;155(6):871–872. doi:10.1192/bjp.155.6.871 PubMed

112. Goldstein ET, Preskorn SH. Mania triggered by a steroid nasal spray in a patient with stable bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146(8):1076–1077. PubMed

113. Vacheron-Trystram MN, Cheref S, Gauillard J, et al. [A case report of mania precipitated by use of DHEA]. (Article in French) Encephale. 2002;28(6 Pt 1):563–566. PubMed

114. Fishman SM, Catarau EM, Sachs G, et al. Corticosteroid-induced mania after single regional application at the celiac plexus. Anesthesiology. 1996;85(5):1194–1196. doi:10.1097/00000542-199611000-00030 PubMed

115. Sharfstein SS, Sack DS, Fauci AS. Relationship between alternate-day corticosteroid therapy and behavioral abnormalities. JAMA. 1982;248(22):2987–2989. doi:10.1001/jama.248.22.2987 PubMed

116. Daban C, Vieta E, Mackin P, et al. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and bipolar disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2005;28(2):469–480. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2005.01.005 PubMed

117. Krishnan RR, Maltbie AA, Davidson JR. Abnormal cortisol suppression in bipolar patients with simultaneous manic and depressive symptoms. Am J Psychiatry. 1983;140(2):203–205. PubMed

118. Swann AC, Stokes PE, Casper R, et al. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical function in mixed and pure mania. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1992;85(4):270–274. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb01468.x PubMed

119. Gann H, Riemann D, Hohagen F, et al. 48-hour rapid cycling: results of psychopathometric, polysomnographic, PET imaging and neuro-endocrine longitudinal investigations in a single case. J Affect Disord. 1993;28(2):133–140. doi:10.1016/0165-0327(93)90042-I PubMed

120. Doerr P, von Zerssen D, Fischler M, et al. Relationship between mood changes and adrenal cortical activity in a patient with 48-hour unipolar-depressive cycles. J Affect Disord. 1979;1(2):93–104. doi:10.1016/0165-0327(79)90028-4 PubMed

121. Bunney WE Jr, Hartmann EL, Mason JW. Study of a patient with 48-hour manic-depressive cycles, II: strong positive correlation between endocrine factors and manic defense patterns. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12:619–625. PubMed

122. Wei Q, Lu XY, Liu L, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor overexpression in forebrain: a mouse model of increased emotional lability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(32):11851–11856. doi:10.1073/pnas.0402208101 PubMed

123. Wehr TA, Sack DA, Rosenthal NE. Sleep reduction as a final common pathway in the genesis of mania. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144(2):201–204. PubMed

124. Barbini B, Colombo C, Benedetti F, et al. The unipolar-bipolar dichotomy and the response to sleep deprivation. Psychiatry Res. 1998;79(1):43–50. doi:10.1016/S0165-1781(98)00020-1 PubMed

125. Colombo C, Benedetti F, Barbini B, et al. Rate of switch from depression into mania after therapeutic sleep deprivation in bipolar depression. Psychiatry Res. 1999;86(3):267–270. doi:10.1016/S0165-1781(99)00036-0 PubMed

126. Leibenluft E, Albert PS, Rosenthal NE, et al. Relationship between sleep and mood in patients with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 1996;63(2–3):161–168. doi:10.1016/0165-1781(96)02854-5 PubMed

127. Albert I, Cicala GA, Siegel J. The behavioral effects of REM sleep deprivation in rats. Psychophysiology. 1970;6(5):550–560. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1970.tb02244.x PubMed

128. Gessa GL, Pani L, Fadda P, et al. Sleep deprivation in the rat: an animal model of mania. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1995;5(suppl):89–93. doi:10.1016/0924-977X(95)00023-I PubMed

129. Hicks RA, Moore JD, Hayes C, et al. REM sleep deprivation increases aggressiveness in male rats. Physiol Behav. 1979;22(6):1097–1100. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(79)90263-4 PubMed

130. Moore JD, Hayes C, Hicks RA. REM sleep deprivation increases preference for novelty in rats. Physiol Behav. 1979;23(5):975–976. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(79)90211-7 PubMed

131. Ferraz MR, Ferraz MM, Santos R. How REM sleep deprivation and amantadine affects male rat sexual behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001;69(3–4):325–332. doi:10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00508-1 PubMed

132. Benedetti F, Fresi F, Maccioni P, et al. Behavioural sensitization to repeated sleep deprivation in a mice model of mania. Behav Brain Res. 2008;187(2):221–227. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2007.09.012 PubMed

133. Siegel JM, Rogawski MA. A function for REM sleep: regulation of noradrenergic receptor sensitivity. Brain Res. 1988;472(3):213–233. PubMed

134. Demontis MG, Fadda P, Devoto P, et al. Sleep deprivation increases dopamine D1 receptor antagonist [3H]SCH 23390 binding and dopamine-stimulated adenylate cyclase in the rat limbic system. Neurosci Lett. 1990;117(1–2):224–227. doi:10.1016/0304-3940(90)90148-3 PubMed

135. Schreiber W, Opper C, Dickhaus B, et al. Alterations of blood platelet MAO-B activity and LSD-binding in humans after sleep deprivation and recovery sleep. J Psychiatr Res. 1997;31(3):323–331. doi:10.1016/S0022-3956(96)00062-3 PubMed

136. Ebert D, Ebmeier KP. The role of the cingulate gyrus in depression: from functional anatomy to neurochemistry. Biol Psychiatry. 1996;39(12):1044–1050. doi:10.1016/0006-3223(95)00320-7 PubMed

137. Gerner RH, Post RM, Gillin JC, et al. Biological and behavioral effects of one night’s sleep deprivation in depressed patients and normals. J Psychiatr Res. 1979;15(1):21–40. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(79)90004-9 PubMed

138. Post RM, Kotin J, Goodwin FK. Effects of sleep deprivation on mood and central amine metabolism in depressed patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976;33(5):627–632. PubMed

139. Cirelli C, Tononi G. Differential expression of plasticity-related genes in waking and sleep and their regulation by the noradrenergic system. J Neurosci. 2000;20(24):9187–9194. PubMed

140. Tononi G, Cirelli C. Modulation of brain gene expression during sleep and wakefulness: a review of recent findings. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;25(suppl):S28–S35. doi:10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00322-0 PubMed

141. Payne JL, Quiroz JA, Zarate CA Jr, et al. Timing is everything: does the robust upregulation of noradrenergically regulated plasticity genes underlie the rapid antidepressant effects of sleep deprivation? Biol Psychiatry. 2002;52(10):921–926. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01676-1 PubMed

142. Gillin JCMC, Mazure C, Post RM, et al. An EEG sleep study of a bipolar (manic-depressive) patient with a nocturnal switch process. Biol Psychiatry. 1977;12(6):711–718. PubMed

143. Einat H, Manji HK, Gould TD, et al. Possible involvement of the ERK signaling cascade in bipolar disorder: behavioral leads from the study of mutant mice. Drug News Perspect. 2003;16(7):453–463. doi:10.1358/dnp.2003.16.7.829357 PubMed

144. Sitaram N, Gillin JC, Bunney WE Jr. The switch process in manic-depressive illness: circadian variation in time of switch and sleep and manic ratings before and after switch. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1978;58(3):267–278. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1978.tb06938.x PubMed

145. Wirz-Justice A. Biological rhythm disturbances in mood disorders. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006;21(suppl 1):S11–S15. doi:10.1097/01.yic.0000195660.37267.cf PubMed

146. Gould TD, Zarate CA, Manji HK. Glycogen synthase kinase-3: a target for novel bipolar disorder treatments. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65(1):10–21. PubMed

147. Lee KY, Ahn YM, Joo EJ, et al. No association of two common SNPs at position –1727 A/T, –50 C/T of GSK-3 beta polymorphisms with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder of Korean population. Neurosci Lett. 2006;395(2):175–178. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2005.10.059 PubMed

148. Michelon L, Meira-Lima I, Cordeiro Q, et al. Association study of the INPP1, 5HTT, BDNF, AP-2beta and GSK-3beta GENE variants and restrospectively scored response to lithium prophylaxis in bipolar disorder. Neurosci Lett. 2006;403(3):288–293. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2006.05.001 PubMed

149. Benedetti F, Bernasconi A, Lorenzi C, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta promoter gene influences onset of illness in patients affected by bipolar disorder. Neurosci Lett. 2004;355(1–2):37–40. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2003.10.021 PubMed

150. Roybal K, Theobold D, Graham A, et al. Mania-like behavior induced by disruption of CLOCK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(15):6406–6411. doi:10.1073/pnas.0609625104 PubMed

151. Liu L, Foroud T, Xuei X, et al. Evidence of association between brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene and bipolar disorder. Psychiatr Genet. 2008;18(6):267–274. doi:10.1097/YPG.0b013e3283060f59 PubMed

152. Egan MF, Kojima M, Callicott JH, et al. The BDNF val66met polymorphism affects activity-dependent secretion of BDNF and human memory and hippocampal function. Cell. 2003;112(2):257–269. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00035-7 PubMed

153. Sklar P, Gabriel SB, McInnis MG, et al. Family-based association study of 76 candidate genes in bipolar disorder: BDNF is a potential risk locus: brain-derived neutrophic factor. Mol Psychiatry. 2002;7(6):579–593. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001058 PubMed

154. Rybakowski JK, Borkowska A, Czerski PM, et al. Polymorphism of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene and performance on a cognitive prefrontal test in bipolar patients. Bipolar Disord. 2003;5(6):468–472. doi:10.1046/j.1399-5618.2003.00071.x PubMed

155. Müller DJ, de Luca V, Sicard T, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene and rapid-cycling bipolar disorder: family-based association study. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189(4):317–323. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.105.010587 PubMed

156. Dmitrzak-Weglarz M, Rybakowski JK, Suwalska A, et al. Association studies of the BDNF and the NTRK2 gene polymorphisms with prophylactic lithium response in bipolar patients. Pharmacogenomics. 2008;9(11):1595–1603. doi:10.2217/14622416.9.11.1595 PubMed

157. Sarchiapone M, Carli V, Roy A, et al. Association of polymorphism (Val66Met) of brain-derived neurotrophic factor with suicide attempts in depressed patients. Neuropsychobiology. 2008;57(3):139–145. doi:10.1159/000142361 PubMed