McLean-Harvard International First-Episode Project: Two-Year Stability of <em>ICD-10</em> Diagnoses in 500 First-Episode Psychotic Disorder Patients
J Clin Psychiatry 2011;72(2):183-193
© Copyright 2015 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Objective: Because clinical and biologic research and optimal clinical practice require stability of diagnoses over time, we determined stability of ICD-10 psychotic disorder diagnoses and sought predictors of diagnostic instability.
Method: Patients from the McLean-Harvard International First-Episode Project, conducted from 1989 to 2003, who were hospitalized for first psychotic illnesses (N = 500) were diagnosed by ICD-10 criteria at baseline and 24 months, on the basis of extensive prospective assessments, to evaluate the longitudinal stability of specific categorical diagnoses and predictors of diagnostic change.
Results: Diagnostic stability averaged 90.4%, ranking as follows: schizoaffective disorder (100.0%) > mania with psychosis (99.0%) > mixed affective episode (94.9%) > schizophrenia (94.6%) > delusional disorder (88.2%) > severe depressive episode with psychotic symptoms (85.2%) > acute psychosis with/without schizophrenia symptoms = unspecified psychosis (all 66.7%) >> acute schizophrenia-like psychosis (28.6%). Diagnoses changed by 24 months of follow-up to schizoaffective disorder (37.5%), bipolar disorder (25.0%), schizophrenia (16.7%), or unspecified nonorganic psychosis (8.3%), mainly through emerging affective features. By logistic regression, diagnostic change was associated with Schneiderian first-rank psychotic symptoms at intake > lack of premorbid substance use.
Conclusions: We found some psychotic disorder diagnoses to be more stable by ICD-10 than DSM-IV criteria in the same patients, with implications for revisions of both diagnostic systems.
J Clin Psychiatry
Submitted: April 27, 2009; accepted August 14, 2009.
Online ahead of print: July 13, 2010 (doi:10.4088/JCP.09m05311yel).
Corresponding author: Paola Salvatore, MD, International Consortium for Bipolar and Psychotic Disorders Research, Centre Bldg G-7B, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St, Belmont, MA 02478-9106 (firstname.lastname@example.org).