Commentary: The Problematic <em>DSM-5</em> Personality Disorders Proposal: Options for Plan B
J Clin Psychiatry 2011;72(10):1341-1343
© Copyright 2014 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Dissatisfaction with the DSM-IV classification of personality disorders has led to calls for a significant overhaul in the classification of personality disorders for DSM-5. The DSM-5 Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group has proposed a radically new approach, but has not set forth alternative options for consideration. This commentary explores the benefits and drawbacks of alternative options, which include leaving the classification system basically unchanged, as is suggested by Zimmerman and colleagues; changing the personality classification incrementally to transition from the current familiar categorical approach to a superior dimensional framework; and implementing dimensionalized versions of the DSM-IV categories.