Psychiatric Hospital Utilization in Patients Treated With Clozapine for up to 4.5 Years in a State Mental Health Care System
J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59(4):189-194
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Objective: We wished to study long-term psychiatric hospital utilization in a large sample of patients with schizophrenia and/or schizoaffective disorders who were treated with clozapine for up to 4.5 years, and to determine whether or not the reduction in hospital utilization we previously observed in smaller groups for up to 2.5 years was sustained with larger groups and in the longer term.
Method: Patients in Texas state hospitals who had schizophrenia and/or schizoaffective disorder took either clozapine or traditional antipsychotics for 1.5 to 4.5 years. The number of patients in the clozapine group ranged from 383 (1.5 years of treatment) to 29 (4.5 years). The group of patients who took traditional antipsychotics was made up of all patients (N=233) with similar diagnoses, symptom severity, and duration of illness present in Texas state hospitals on an index day.
Results: The clozapine group showed a rapid and continuing decrease in hospital bed-days compared with controls who took traditional antipsychotics. The number of clozapine-treated patients who required little or no hospitalization during successive 6-month periods became significant (p<.0001) within 1.5 years, and continued to increase. Conversely, the number of patients taking clozapine who required virtually continuous state hospitalization decreased markedly compared with those taking traditional antipsychotics.
Conclusion: Potential hospital cost savings are substantial, even though overall group results are diluted by clozapine nonresponders. Most treatment costs for clozapine nonresponders were related to hospital care; most or all of such costs would have been present in any event had these patients remained on traditional antipsychotic therapy. We believe a trial of clozapine therapy provides a low-cost opportunity for a highly effective and highly cost-saving outcome in those patients who will favorably respond to this therapy. We discuss clinical, social, and economic advantages of modern pharmaceutical treatments over traditional drugs.