Assessing Demoralization and Depression in the Setting of Medical Disease
J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66(3):391-394
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Objective: The aim of this study was to
assess the presence of demoralization and major depression in the
setting of medical disease.
Method: 807 consecutive outpatients recruited
from different medical settings (gastroenterology, cardiology,
endocrinology, and oncology) were assessed according to DSM-IV
criteria and Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research,
using semistructured research interviews.
Results: Demoralization was identified in 245
patients (30.4%), while major depression was present in 135
patients (16.7%). Even though there was a considerable overlap
between the 2 diagnoses, 59 patients (43.7%) with major
depression were not classified as demoralized, and 169 patients
(69.0%) with demoralization did not satisfy the criteria for
Conclusions: The findings suggest a high
prevalence of demoralization in the medically ill and the
feasibility of a differentiation between demoralization and
depression. Further research may determine whether
demoralization, alone or in association with major depression,
entails prognostic and clinical implications.