Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes of Psychogenic Movement Disorder
J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66(12):1529-1534
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Background: Psychogenic movement
disorder (PMD) is a subtype of conversion disorder.
We describe the outcomes of a series of PMD
patients following antidepressant treatment.
Method: Twenty-three outpatients
with chronic PMD, diagnosed using Fahn and Williams' criteria, underwent psychiatric
assessment. The patients were referred for assessment
and management from January 2003 to July 2004. Fifteen agreed to be treated with
antidepressants. Patients received citalopram or paroxetine;
those who did not respond after 4 weeks of taking
an optimal dose were switched to venlafaxine. Concurrently, 3 had supportive psychotherapy, and
1 had family intervention. Assessments included the DSM-IV-based Mini-International
Neuropsychiatric Interview and scales measuring
depression, anxiety, and motor and global severity.
Results: Eighteen patients (78%) had at least
1 Axis I diagnosis in addition to the somatoform diagnosis, and 3 (13%) had somatization
disorder. Five (22%) had previous psychiatric
contact. Nine (39%) had previously been treated with
antidepressants, but only 4 (17%) had adequate
trials. No significant differences existed in patient
characteristics between treated and untreated
groups. Among treated patients, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores improved
from baseline (p < .01). Two treated subgroups
were identified: 10 patients (67%) had primary
conversion disorder, of whom 8 had marked motor
and global improvements with 7 complete
remissions, and 5 (33%) had primary hypochondriasis,
somatization disorder, or probable factitious
disorder/malingering, of whom none improved. All of
the patients with primary conversion disorder had
a current or previous depressive or anxiety
disorder compared with 40% (N = 2) of the patients
with additional somatoform diagnoses.
Discussion: Our preliminary findings
suggest that chronic PMD with primary conversion
symptoms and with recent or current depression or anxiety may respond to antidepressants.
Further well-designed studies, now under way, are
required to confirm these findings.