Comparison of Intramuscular Ziprasidone, Olanzapine, or Aripiprazole for Agitation: A Quantitative Review of Efficacy and Safety
J Clin Psychiatry 2007;68(12):1876-1885
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of the intramuscular formulations of ziprasidone, olanzapine, and aripiprazole in treating agitation.
Data sources: The pivotal registration trials were accessed by querying on-line literature and clinical trial databases. Pharmacovigilance data and posters were requested from the manufacturers. No date or language constraints were applied.
Study Selection: Nine double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials were identified.
Data Extraction: Number needed to treat (NNT) for response to treatment for agitation and number needed to harm (NNH) for extrapyramidal effects were calculated from the study reports. Additional safety outcomes subject to NNH analysis were obtained from product labeling.
Data Synthesis: Using the a priori definitions of response at 2 hours after the first injection, NNT for response versus placebo (or placebo equivalent) in treating agitation for the pooled data at the recommended dose of ziprasidone 10-20 mg was 3 (95% CI = 2 to 4), for olanzapine 10 mg was 3 (95% CI = 2 to 3), and for aripiprazole 9.75 mg was 5 (95% CI = 4 to 8). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring during the pivotal trials revealed statistically significant NNH versus placebo (or placebo equivalent) for aripiprazole for headache (NNH = 20, 95% CI = 11 to 170) and nausea (NNH = 17, 95% CI = 11 to 38), for ziprasidone in the treatment of headache (NNH = 15, 95% CI = 8 to 703), and for olanzapine in treatment-emergent hypotension (NNH = 50, 95% CI = 30 to 154). Olanzapine and aripiprazole had a more favorable extrapyramidal side effect profile compared to haloperidol. (There was no haloperidol treatment arm in the ziprasidone studies.)
Conclusions: Although the lowest NNT, and hence strongest therapeutic effect, was seen for the studies of ziprasidone and olanzapine as opposed to aripiprazole, head-to-head controlled studies directly comparing these 3 agents are needed.