First-Year Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Benefits: Medication Access and Continuity Among Dual Eligible Psychiatric Patients
J Clin Psychiatry 2010;71(4):400-410
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Purchase This PDF for $40.00
If you are not a paid subscriber, you may purchase the PDF.
(You'll need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.)
Receive immediate full-text access to JCP. You can subscribe to JCP online-only ($86) or print + online ($156 individual).
With your subscription, receive a free PDF collection of the NCDEU Festschrift articles. Hurry! This offer ends December 31, 2011.
If you are a paid subscriber to JCP and do not yet have a username and password, activate your subscription now.
As a paid subscriber who has activated your subscription, you have access to the HTML and PDF versions of this item.
Click here to login.
Did you forget your password?
Still can't log in? Contact the Circulation Department at 1-800-489-1001 x4 or send email
Objective: This study provides national data
on medication access and continuity problems
experienced during the first year of the Medicare Part D prescription drug program, which was implemented on January 1, 2006, among a national sample of Medicare and Medicaid “dual eligible” psychiatric patients.
Method: Practice-based research methods
were used to collect clinician-reported data
across the full range of public and private psychiatric treatment settings. A random sample of psychiatrists was selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Among these physicians, 1,490 provided clinically detailed data on a systematically selected sample of 2,941 dual eligible psychiatric patients.
Results: Overall, 43.3% of patients were
reported to be unable to obtain clinically indicated medication refills or new prescriptions in 2006 because they were not covered or approved; 28.9% discontinued or temporarily stopped their medication(s) as a result of prescription drug coverage or management issues; and 27.7% were reported to be previously stable on their medications but were required to switch medications. Adjusting for case mix to control for sociodemographic and clinical confounders, the predicted probability of an adverse event among patients
with medication access problems was 0.64 compared to 0.36 for those without access problems (P < .0001). All prescription drug utilization
management features studied were associated
with increased medication access problems (P < .0001). Adjusting for patient case mix, patients with “step therapy” (P < .0001), limits on medication number/dosing (P < .0001), or prior authorization (P < .0001) had 2.4 to 3.4 times the increased likelihood of an adverse event.
Conclusions: More effective Part D policies and management practices are needed to promote clinically safer and appropriate pharmacotherapy for psychiatric patients to enhance treatment outcomes.
Submitted: August 8, 2008; accepted January 2, 2009.
Online ahead of print: November 17, 2009.
Corresponding author: Joyce C. West, PhD, American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education (APIRE) Practice Research Network (PRN), 1000 Wilson Blvd, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209 (firstname.lastname@example.org).