Skip to content
Original Research
J Clin Psychiatry
January 2025
Effects of Intravenous Hydroxyzine Versus Haloperidol Monotherapy for Delirium: A Retrospective Study
JCP 2025;86(1):10.4088/JCP.24m15569
Full Article
Read the complete peer-reviewed article in J Clin Psychiatry.
JCP 2025;86(1):10.4088/JCP.24m15569
Clinical Summary
Delirium is common in hospitalized older adults, and the standard pharmacologic fallback—antipsychotics—carries risks that matter most in the very patients who often need treatment, including extrapyramidal symptoms, QT prolongation, and increased mortality in elderly patients and those with dementia. This study asks a practical inpatient question: when oral treatment is not feasible, can intravenous hydroxyzine perform as well as or better than intravenous haloperidol for delirium?
FAQ
What did this study find about intravenous hydroxyzine compared with intravenous haloperidol for delirium?
10 questions
Key Takeaways
This analysis focused on a highly selected monotherapy cohort: only 71 (1.3%) hydroxyzine-treated patients and 82 (1.5%) haloperidol-treated patients met eligibility criteria out of 5,555 patients who developed delirium, so these findings apply most directly when other delirium agents are not being given concurrently.
6 takeaways
Clinical Guide
How should clinicians and inpatient teams identify hospitalized patients who need structured delirium surveillance?
5 steps
Clinical Guide
How should clinicians decide when intravenous hydroxyzine monotherapy is a reasonable alternative to intravenous haloperidol for delirium?
7 steps