Key Takeaways

  1. The 80 mg arm was stopped after interim futility analysis because it had a less than 20% probability of reaching an effect size of at least 0.35, supporting early discontinuation of underperforming CIAS doses in adaptive trial designs.
  2. At 24 weeks, the primary endpoint showed virtually no separation from placebo on the MCCB neurocognitive composite T-score, with mean changes from baseline of 1.08± 5.78 [SD] for placebo and 1.36±4.80 [SD] for 240 mg basmisanil (ES=0.05, P =.793).
  3. A signal on 1 memory measure should be interpreted cautiously: the delayed recall condition VPA total raw score II reached an ES of 0.45 (P<.1) at week 24, but there were no corresponding benefits on other verbal memory, working memory, global cognition, functional, or symptom measures.
  4. The prespecified subgroup strategy did not identify a clinically useful responder profile; numerical effects favored older patients (ES =0.39) over younger patients (ES=−0.32) and the preserved subtype (ES=0.27) over deteriorated (ES =0) or compromised (ES=−0.04) cognition.
  5. Tolerability was acceptable despite high overall attrition: 81 (37.9%) patients withdrew prematurely, but safety-related withdrawals were only 3.7% to 5.6%, and serious adverse events were similar in the 240 mg treatment (4 events) and placebo (5 events) groups.
  6. Psychosis worsening was not increased with basmisanil in this sample, occurring in 3.7% and 3.8% of the 80 mg and 240 mg groups versus 6.2% with placebo, with no observed proconvulsive liabilities, insomnia, anxiety, depression, sedation, or suicidality.
  1. Do not expect basmisanil 240 mg twice a day to improve CIAS in routine practice; after 24 weeks, the MCCB neurocognitive composite T-score changed by 1.08± 5.78 [SD] with placebo and 1.36±4.80 [SD] with basmisanil (ES=0.05, P =.793).

  2. An isolated cognitive signal is not enough to justify a procognitive claim; the delayed recall condition VPA total raw score II reached an ES of 0.45 (P<.1) at week 24, but no benefit emerged on verbal learning, working memory, other MCCB domains, functional measures, or symptom ratings.

  3. Do not target younger patients or the deteriorated cognitive subtype for basmisanil, because the prespecified subgroup strategy failed: older patients showed ES =0.39, younger patients ES=−0.32, and subtype effects were ES=0.27 for preserved, ES =0 for deteriorated, and ES=−0.04 for compromised.

  4. Repeated pre-randomization cognitive testing can suppress early placebo inflation in CIAS trials; with 3 MCCB administrations before randomization, no improvement in the placebo group was noted at week 12, and the second assessment showed a change of 1.08, below the 1.9 points cited from prior controlled trials.

  5. High attrition does not necessarily mean poor tolerability in schizophrenia cognition trials; 81 (37.9%) patients withdrew prematurely, but safety-related withdrawals were only 3.7% to 5.6%, and worsening of psychosis was reported in 6.2% with placebo versus 3.8% with 240 mg basmisanil.

Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.