Article Summary

Clinical Summary: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Following Esketamine for Major Depression and Suicidal Ideation for Relapse Prevention: The CBT-ENDURE Randomized Trial

Patients hospitalized or recently discharged with major depression and suicidal ideation remain at high relapse and suicide risk after the standard 4-week esketamine course ends. This trial asks the practical next-step question: whether adding a structured 16-week CBT course can sustain gains and improve longer-term outcomes in a population that most psychiatric trials have historically excluded.

Design the CBT-ENDURE randomized trial
N 93 were randomized
Population treatment-seeking patients with MDSI
Duration The trial consisted of 3 phases. In phase 1, all subjects received an index course of intranasal esketamine (4 weeks). In phase 2, subjects randomized to CBT received 16 weeks of a combination of one-on-one and computer-based therapy sessions, beginning in week 3 (phases 1 and 2 overlapped by 2 weeks). Phase 3 consisted of an additional 8 weeks of naturalistic follow-up

Key Findings

  • Adjunctive CBT improved self-reported suicidal ideation at week 18: least squares mean change in BSSI was −6.01 for the CBT group versus −4.10 for the TAU-only group (mean difference of −1.91, 95% CI, −3.57 to −0.24, P=.025).
  • Adjunctive CBT improved overall depressive symptoms at week 18: least squares mean change in composite MADRS score was −11.29 for CBT versus −7.52 for TAU only (mean difference of −3.77, 95% CI −6.62 to −0.93, P= .009).
  • Clinician-rated suicide severity also favored CBT at week 18: CGI improvement changed by −1.00 with CBT versus −0.63 with TAU-only (mean difference −0.37, 95% CI −0.68 to −0.05, P=.023), and CGI severity changed by −0.81 versus −0.49 (group difference of −0.33, 95% CI −0.58 to −0.08, P=.011).
  • Not all suicidality measures separated groups: the MADRS SI item changed by −1.37 with CBT versus −0.98 with TAU-only (mean difference of −0.39, 95% CI −0.84 to 0.06, P=.088), and the C-SSRS ideation score changed by −0.80 versus −0.93 (group difference 0.13, 95% CI −0.39 to 0.65, P=.623).
  • The trial met its feasibility target in this high-risk sample: 84/93 (90.3%) were retained through week 4, 72/93 (77.4%) through week 18, and 69/93 (74.2%) through week 26; among those randomized to CBT, the overall completion rate of all CBT sessions was 80.7% and completion of the 9 computer-assisted CBT modules was 76.7%.
Clinical Bottom Line

For patients with major depression and suicidal ideation receiving intranasal esketamine, adding a structured 16-week CBT course improved longer-term suicidal ideation and depressive symptom outcomes versus esketamine with treatment as usual alone. This combination was feasible to deliver and retain even in a severely ill sample that included many inpatients.

Practice Implications

  • When using esketamine for MDSI, plan beyond the 4-week index course; adding structured CBT is a practical relapse-prevention strategy supported by better week-18 BSSI, composite MADRS, and CGI outcomes.
  • Do not rely on a single suicidality measure to track benefit. In this trial, BSSI and CGI measures detected between-group differences, whereas the MADRS SI item and C-SSRS ideation subscale did not.
  • Expect that high-risk patients can engage in psychotherapy during and after acute esketamine treatment: CBT session completion was 80.7%, and computer-assisted module completion was 76.7%.
  • Maintain close follow-up after hospitalization or emergency-level presentations. Most suicide-related serious adverse events were psychiatric in nature (19/24, 79.2%), and most psychiatric SAEs occurred in patients who were inpatients at enrollment (14/18, 77.8%).
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.