Key Takeaways

  1. Recent criminal legal involvement at entry was a strong marker for early treatment disruption: 13 of 39 participants (33%) with CLI at baseline had later CLI versus 39 of 335 participants (12%) without baseline CLI, and dropout due to incarceration was 18% versus 2%.
  2. Because 14 of the 16 incarceration-related dropouts (88%) occurred within the first 6 months of treatment, clinicians may need intensified monitoring and care coordination immediately after enrollment for patients with recent CLI.
  3. Lower educational attainment and longer duration of untreated psychosis were linked to CLI before treatment, with participants with a longer DUP significantly more likely to have CLI (16%) than those with a shorter DUP (6%), supporting screening for legal vulnerability when FEP presentation has been prolonged.
  4. Substance use findings were most clinically useful when focused on current use rather than lifetime diagnosis: in multivariable models, cannabis use in the month before baseline was the only baseline predictor that remained significant for later CLI.
  5. Persistent symptom burden mattered after treatment entry: when longitudinal clinical variables were modeled together, only average excitement symptoms remained associated with follow-up CLI (B = .20, SE = .09, p = .02, OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.03–1.44), highlighting hostility, impulsivity, and uncooperativeness as practical targets for risk reduction.
  6. NAVIGATE did not reduce CLI relative to Community Care in this sample, with similar follow-up rates (13.88% and 13.61%) and no adjusted difference (B = .02, SE = .38, p = .96, OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.55–1.87), suggesting standard Coordinated Specialty Care may need added criminogenic-risk interventions for patients at highest risk.
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.