Key Takeaways

  1. Only 11 of 21 completers (52.4%) achieved 12 weeks of biochemically verified abstinence, highlighting that sustained cessation was feasible for about half of this comorbid PTSD/CUD sample under weekly monitoring, brief therapy, and contingency management.
  2. The separation in PTSD outcomes was clinically large by week 12: CAPS-5 total scores fell from 36.2 to 10.5 in abstinent participants versus 34.6 to 21.8 in nonabstainers, and symptom counts fell from 14.3 to 4.1 versus 13.5 to 8.9.
  3. Symptom gains were not uniform across PTSD domains; abstinence-related interactions were significant for avoidance and hyperarousal severity (Cluster C: β=−2.34, 95% CI: −3.88 to −0.80, P=.0043; Cluster E: β=−5.57, 95% CI: −8.74 to −2.41, P=.001), which may help target counseling toward symptoms patients often self-medicate with cannabis.
  4. Reexperiencing symptoms may be less sensitive to cannabis abstinence alone in the short term, as Cluster B showed no significant time×group interaction for symptom count (β=−0.78, 95% CI: −2.02 to 0.47, P=.23) despite overall improvement over time.
  5. Baseline THC-COOH was not significantly correlated with baseline PTSD burden, and adding THC-COOH as a covariate did not eliminate the abstinence effect on PTSD severity or symptom count, suggesting that sustained abstinence status carried more explanatory value than metabolite level alone in this study.
  6. Because analyses were restricted to completers and all participants received weekly 20-minute therapy sessions plus abstinence-contingent payments of $200, $300, and $400 at weeks 4, 8, and 12, these findings are most applicable to structured treatment settings rather than usual care without reinforcement.
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.