Key Takeaways

  1. Engagement was strong in this veteran sample: only 5 patients (7.9%) discontinued EAT, including 4 patients (6.3%) before midpoint and 1 patient (1.6%) after, despite the intervention requiring weekly travel to an equestrian center.
  2. PTSD symptom improvement was already detectable by midpoint on both clinician-rated and self-report measures, with CAPS-5 improvement of d = 0.96 and PCL-5 improvement of d = 0.70, suggesting measurable benefit can emerge before the full 8-session course is completed.
  3. The largest PTSD change was observed from pretreatment to posttreatment, with CAPS-5 decreasing from 38.6 (8.1) to 26.9 (12.4) and PCL-5 from 50.7 (13.8) to 34.6 (16.7); posttreatment gains were then maintained at 3-month follow-up rather than continuing to increase.
  4. Depressive symptoms also improved, but effect sizes were smaller than for PTSD: HDRS showed d = 0.69 and BDI-II showed d = 0.49 from pre- to posttreatment, which may help set realistic expectations when discussing likely targets of equine-assisted therapy with patients.
  5. This protocol was delivered in a highly structured format that may be important for replication: 8 weekly, manual-guided, 90-minute group sessions, groups of 3 to 5 veterans, co-led by a licensed mental health professional and an equine specialist, with the same two horses used throughout each group.
  6. Interpret results in the context of substantial concurrent care: 47 enrolled veterans were already receiving psychotherapy alone (n = 5), pharmacotherapy alone (n = 11), or both (n = 31), and none were in a strict manualized progressive PTSD treatment such as prolonged exposure or cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.