Key Takeaways

  1. Revisit risk was front-loaded: 29 events had occurred by 15 days, 43 by 1 month, and 69 by 2 months, suggesting that follow-up intensity may need to be greatest in the first weeks after discharge.
  2. Within 6 months, 25.4% of patients returned for SITB, while the Kaplan–Meier estimate showed a survival rate of 74.6% at the end of follow-up, indicating that roughly 1 in 4 youths re-presented despite standard emergency care.
  3. Several markers of clinical complexity were associated with ED return in the Cox model, including previous mental health hospitalizations (HR = 1.363, 95% CI [1.107–1.679], P = .004), comorbidities (HR = 1.894, 95% CI [1.258–2.850], P = .002), and eating problems (HR = 1.560, 95% CI [1.070–2.272], P = .021).
  4. Contextual and psychosocial factors also mattered: family conflicts were associated with revisit risk (HR = 1.486, 95% CI [1.012–2.182], P = .043), reinforcing the value of assessing the home environment rather than focusing only on the index suicidal presentation.
  5. The type of initial presentation did not clearly separate low- and high-risk groups, as return rates were 21.7% for NSSI, 25.8% for suicidal ideation, and 25.3% for suicide attempts, and some youths returned with a different form of SITB than at index visit.
  6. Treatment changes at the prior emergency visit were associated with later return (HR = 2.212, 95% CI [1.177–4.159], P = .014), which may help clinicians identify a subgroup whose acute presentation required escalation and warrants closer post-ED monitoring.
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.