Key Takeaways
Extended Takeaways
- In adults aged ≥65 years, AIMS improvement exceeded the estimated minimal clinically important difference of −2 points by Week 8 and continued to deepen over time, with mean changes of −4.5 ± 0.7 at Week 8, −8.6 ± 0.9 at Week 24, and −8.8 ± 0.9 at Week 48.
- Responder rates in the elderly subgroup increased steadily with continued treatment: the proportion achieving ≥30% AIMS improvement rose from 58.0% at Week 8 to 88.5% at Week 24 and 89.3% at Week 48, while ≥50% response increased from 40.0% to 65.4% to 82.1% over the same timepoints.
- Week 48 outcomes favored the 80 mg group numerically in both age strata, with mean AIMS changes of −9.8 in elderly participants on 80 mg versus −6.4 on 40 mg; the authors note, however, that no conclusions can be drawn regarding dose effects because dosing in KINECT 4 was based on investigator judgment of tolerability and response.
- Clinician-rated global improvement at Week 48 was high in older adults, with 92.9% of elderly participants rated much improved or very much improved on CGI-TD; this was significantly higher than the 76.5% observed in younger participants, whereas PGIC response in the elderly subgroup was 85.7% and not statistically different from younger adults.
- Tolerability in the elderly subgroup was broadly comparable to younger adults for overall TEAEs and serious TEAEs, but discontinuations due to TEAEs were more frequent in older patients (25.5% vs 13.3%, P =.023), which is important when monitoring persistence in long-term treatment.
- Psychiatric and motor safety signals remained stable during long-term treatment in elderly participants, with minimal mean changes on PANSS, CDSS, YMRS, MADRS, BARS, and SAS and no significant Week 48 differences versus younger adults.