Key Takeaways

  1. In this cohort restricted to patients who achieved continuous LAI treatment, only 30.5% started an LAI within the first year after diagnosis, indicating that early use remained uncommon despite a decade-long shift toward earlier prescribing.
  2. Later LAI initiation was linked to lower discontinuation risk: compared with initiation within 1 year, hazard ratios were significantly lower at 2–3 years (HR =0.774; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.692–0.866; P<.001), 3–4 years (HR=0.768; 95% CI, 0.682–0.864; P<.001), 4–5 years (HR=0.698; 95% CI, 0.613–0.794; P5 years (HR =0.657; 95% CI, 0.586–0.736; P<.001).
  3. Among patients who had psychiatric hospitalization during LAI treatment, the association between delayed initiation and hospitalization burden was stronger: relative to the 5 years (β=0.162, t =7.71, P <.001).
  4. Even within timing strata, added delay sometimes mattered: in hospitalized patients, longer time to LAI initiation was associated with higher hospitalization burden in the 5-year (β=1.87×10−4, t=4.96, P<.001) groups.
  5. Prescribing patterns were dominated by newer agents, with paliperidone palmitate 1-month formulation accounting for 76.9% of initial LAI prescriptions in 2011 and 65.2% in 2020, while aripiprazole monohydrate rose from 19.8% in 2011 to 43.5% in 2017 before declining to 33.8% in 2020.
  6. Mean time from diagnosis to LAI initiation fell markedly from 1,980.8 days (SD=1,095.4) in 2011 to 133.4 days (SD=127.6) in 2020, but mean continuous LAI treatment duration also dropped from 646.1 days (SD=736.9) to 246.4 days (SD=140.0), suggesting earlier adoption has not translated into longer maintenance exposure.
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.