Key Takeaways

  1. Across pooled subjective outcomes at month 1, lemborexant 5 mg and 10 mg produced NNT values versus placebo < 10 for ISI score < 10, ISI score ≤ 7, ISI score ≥ 6-point decrease from baseline, and sTST > 80-minute increase from baseline, whereas pooled daridorexant 25 mg and 50 mg had no NNT values versus placebo < 10.
  2. A dose-response signal was seen with both agents but was clearer for lemborexant: for sTST improvement > 80 minutes, the NNT versus placebo was 7 with lemborexant 10 mg and 13 with lemborexant 5 mg, and somnolence also increased with dose (NNH 15 for 10 mg and 28 for 5 mg at month 1).
  3. For objective sleep maintenance, lemborexant showed particularly strong short-term effects, with NNT = 5 for ≥ 50% WASO improvement for both 5 mg and 10 mg in SUNRISE 1; PSG-based LPS improvement was more similar between drugs than subjective measures.
  4. Month 3 tolerability favored daridorexant for common sedating adverse events: pooled daridorexant 25-mg and 50-mg doses had NNH = 49 for fatigue and NNH = 85 for somnolence, compared with pooled lemborexant NNH = 29 for fatigue and NNH = 12 for somnolence.
  5. Discontinuation due to an adverse event was uncommon with both drugs, but the indirect comparison was influenced by placebo rates: pooled daridorexant studies had higher discontinuation rates in placebo than active treatment, leading to an imputed NNH of 1,000 for LHH calculations, while pooled lemborexant month 3 data yielded NNH = 52 [NS].
  6. Interpret indirect efficacy comparisons cautiously because the trial populations were not matched: SUNRISE 1 enrolled older adults ≥ 55 years or ≥ 65 years with ISI score ≥ 13 and mean baseline LPS 44.6–44.9 minutes, whereas daridorexant studies enrolled adults ≥ 18 years with ISI score ≥ 15 and mean baseline LPS 63.6–71.8 min.
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.