HOW-TO GUIDES 2 guides
Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions-
Treatment-resistant depression was estimated in 30.9% of US adults with medication-treated major depressive disorder, equal to 2.76 million adults out of 8.95 million with medication-treated MDD. The authors also estimated that this represented about 1.1% of the overall US adult population.
-
In the claims-based model, treatment-resistant depression was defined as initiation of a third antidepressant treatment course, including augmentation therapy, after changing 2 antidepressant courses of adequate dose and duration. A treatment gap of up to 180 days was allowed between consecutive antidepressant treatment courses.
-
The study estimated that adults with medication-treated MDD incurred $92.7 billion in annual incremental costs relative to adults without MDD. This total included $45.5 billion in health care costs, $28.8 billion in productivity costs, and $18.3 billion in unemployment costs.
-
Adults with treatment-resistant depression accounted for $43.8 billion, or 47.2%, of the total $92.7 billion incremental cost burden of medication-treated MDD. This was disproportionate to their population share, because they represented 30.9% of adults with medication-treated MDD.
-
The weighted mean annual per-person incremental health care cost across US payers was $9,323 for adults with treatment-resistant depression versus $3,197 for adults with non-treatment-resistant MDD, each compared with adults without MDD. Nationally, this translated to $25.8 billion in incremental health care costs for TRD and $19.8 billion for non-TRD MDD.
-
The weighted mean annual per-person incremental productivity cost across US payers was $6,727 for employees with treatment-resistant depression compared with adults without MDD. The weighted mean annual incremental unemployment rate for adults with treatment-resistant depression was 8.0 percentage points, and the national incremental unemployment burden of TRD was estimated at $8.7 billion.
-
Treatment-resistant depression had a somewhat higher work-function burden than non-TRD MDD. The weighted mean annual per-person incremental productivity cost was $6,727 for TRD versus $5,763 for non-TRD MDD, and the weighted mean annual incremental unemployment rate was 8.0 versus 3.9 percentage points, respectively, each relative to adults without MDD.
-
Yes. In the calculated prevalent samples, the proportion of adults with treatment-resistant depression among those with medication-treated MDD ranged from 21.4% in Medicare to 44.2% in Medicaid. The study then weighted these payer-specific estimates by payer prevalence and adjusted for dual coverage to estimate national prevalence.
-
The study found that treatment-resistant depression contributed disproportionately because its per-person burden was substantially higher than that of non-TRD MDD. Adults with TRD represented less than one-third of adults with medication-treated MDD but accounted for 56.6% of excess health care costs, 47.7% of unemployment costs, and 47.2% of total incremental costs.
-
The authors noted several limitations. These included extrapolating mean incremental costs from insured populations to uninsured populations; not capturing quality-of-life burden, caregiver burden, life-years lost, or patients' out-of-pocket costs; using proxy definitions based on treatment patterns because symptom burden was unavailable in claims data; combining inputs from several claims and survey studies with different methodologies; and assuming that the ratio of episode duration in TRD versus non-TRD MDD was consistent across insurance channels.