Clinical Summary

Clinical Summary: Rapid Onset and Sustained Efficacy of Onfasprodil (MIJ821), a Novel NR2B Negative Allosteric Modulator, in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study

Patients with treatment-resistant depression need options that work within hours, not weeks, but currently available rapid-acting NMDA-modulating treatments carry dissociative and psychotomimetic risks. This study tests whether onfasprodil, an NR2B-selective NMDA negative allosteric modulator, can deliver rapid antidepressant effects with a more manageable tolerability profile.

Design a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study
N 72 patients were randomized
Population adults (aged 18–65 years) with MDD and prior failure of ≥2 standard antidepressants (where 2 of the failed treatments were different antidepressants, at least 1 of which was being taken in the current depressive episode) of adequate dose and ≥8 weeks duration in a major depressive episode (per DSM-5 criteria) and a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≥24
Duration The total study duration was 14 weeks and comprised a screening period (maximum 4 weeks), a 36-day treatment period, and a 5-week follow-up period

Key Findings

  • At 24 hours after start of infusion, onfasprodil beat placebo on the primary end point: the adjusted arithmetic mean difference was −8.25 (P = .0013) for pooled onfasprodil 0.16 mg/kg and −5.71 (P = .0196) for pooled onfasprodil 0.32 mg/kg.
  • Ketamine also separated from placebo at 24 hours, with an adjusted mean difference of −5.67 (P = .0461), while the pooled onfasprodil 0.16 mg/kg effect was numerically larger than the pooled onfasprodil 0.32 mg/kg effect.
  • At 48 hours after start of first infusion, mean decreases in MADRS total score were −14.94 for pooled onfasprodil 0.16 mg/kg, −15.25 for pooled onfasprodil 0.32 mg/kg, and −18.89 for ketamine, and the difference between the onfasprodil groups and ketamine was not statistically significant.
  • At Week 6, 2 regimens remained significantly better than placebo on MMRM analysis: onfasprodil 0.16 mg/kg biweekly showed an adjusted arithmetic mean difference of −6.46 (−11.78 to −1.15; P = .0598), and onfasprodil 0.32 mg/kg weekly showed −5.42 (−10.83 to −0.02; P=.0993).
  • Dissociation was reported in 5 (23.8%) patients in the pooled onfasprodil 0.16 mg/kg group and 5 (26.3%) in the pooled onfasprodil 0.32 mg/kg group versus 5 (50.0%) in the ketamine group; the ketamine group had a mean change from baseline in CADSS total score of 10.30 at 1 hour after the start of infusion.
Clinical Bottom Line

Onfasprodil produced antidepressant effects within 24 hours in treatment-resistant depression, with benefit sustained to 48 hours and, for selected regimens, through Week 6. In this small proof-of-concept trial, the 0.16 mg/kg dose—especially biweekly—showed the strongest overall efficacy signal with dissociative adverse effects occurring less often than with ketamine.

Practice Implications

  • For patients with TRD who need rapid symptom reduction, an NR2B-selective approach showed placebo-adjusted MADRS improvement by 24 hours, so early follow-up after the first infusion is clinically meaningful.
  • Do not assume higher dose is better: the pooled onfasprodil 0.16 mg/kg group showed a larger 24-hour placebo-adjusted effect (−8.25) than the pooled 0.32 mg/kg group (−5.71), and the 0.16 mg/kg biweekly regimen had the greatest overall MADRS benefit versus placebo at Week 6.
  • Monitor for infusion-proximal neurobehavioral adverse effects such as dizziness, amnesia, somnolence, and dissociation; onfasprodil-related dissociation began 0 to 0.7 hours after the start of infusion and resolved within 1.6 to 7.0 hours after onset.
  • Discuss tolerability in context: at least 1 AE was reported in 61.9% (13/21) of pooled onfasprodil 0.16 mg/kg and 68.4% (13/19) of pooled onfasprodil 0.32 mg/kg groups versus 35.0% (7/20) with placebo, but most AEs were mild in intensity and all TEAEs of interest resolved within a few hours after onset.
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.