Clinical Summary

Clinical Summary: Risk Factors for Reattempt and Suicide Within 6 Months After an Attempt in the French ALGOS Cohort: A Survival Tree Analysis

After a suicide attempt, the next 6 months are a high-risk window for both reattempt and suicide, but bedside risk assessment often does not capture how multiple clinical factors interact. This analysis offers a simple way to sort recently suicidal patients into higher- and lower-risk groups using information available in routine emergency and psychiatric evaluation.

Design The ALGOS study was a multicentric, prospective, single-blind, randomized, and controlled clinical trial with 2 parallel groups conducted from January 26, 2010, to February 28, 2013.
N 972 participants
Population Patients included were men and women of legal age (ie, at least 18 years old) who survived an suicide attempt in the 7 days prior to inclusion, regardless of the method used for the suicide attempt. Patients who had no suicidal intent, were homeless, were under guardianship, or were multirepeaters (more than 4 suicide attempts in the last 3 years) were excluded from the study.
Duration within 6 months after suicide attempt

Key Findings

  • Of 880 participants (90.5%) with known 6-month status, 117 (13.3%) had repeated suicide attempts, 11 (1.1%) of whom completed suicide.
  • The highest-risk subgroup was patients with AUD and acute alcohol use (AAU): among those 127 patients, 38 (29.9%) repeated suicide attempt or died by suicide, with RER = 2.2 and RR (95% CI) = 2.92 (2.08 to 4.10).
  • Among 46 individuals without AUD and with a history of more than 2 suicide attempts in the past 3 years, 12 individuals repeated suicide attempt; the RER was 2, and the RR (95% CI) was 2.11 (1.25 to 3.54).
  • The lowest-risk subgroup was 361 individuals without AUD, with fewer than 2 previous suicide attempts in the past 3 years, and without anxiety disorder; 23 repeated suicide attempt during the 6 months, with RER = 0.49 and RR (95% CI) = 0.36 (0.23 to 0.55).
  • The simplified clinician algorithm identified a poor prognosis group with HR = 1.78; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.24; P < .01 and AUC of 0.63, with sensitivity of 0.8 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.87), specificity of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.50), positive predictive value of 0.19 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.22), and negative predictive value of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92 to 0.96).
Clinical Bottom Line

In the first 6 months after a suicide attempt, the clearest high-risk patterns were alcohol use disorder with acute alcohol use during the index attempt and more than 2 suicide attempts in the past 3 years. The simplified algorithm can support post-attempt risk stratification, but its modest AUC of 0.63 means it should guide follow-up planning rather than replace clinical judgment.

Practice Implications

  • Ask specifically about alcohol use disorder and acute alcohol use during the index suicide attempt, because among patients with AUD, 38 of 127 (29.9%) with AAU reattempted or died by suicide, whereas none of the 19 patients with AUD without AAU repeated suicide attempt.
  • Treat more than 2 suicide attempts in the past 3 years as a major near-term warning sign; in this subgroup, 12 of 46 patients reattempted, with RR (95% CI) of 2.11 (1.25 to 3.54).
  • Screen for anxiety disorder during post-attempt assessment, since patients without AUD, with a history of 1 or 2 previous suicide attempts in the past 3 years, and anxiety disorder had 42 reattempts among 325 subjects.
  • Use the simplified algorithm to help structure follow-up intensity rather than to decide care in isolation, because its sensitivity was 0.8 and negative predictive value was 0.94, but specificity was 0.47 and positive predictive value was 0.19.
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.