Key Takeaways

From the Authors As published in the article
  1. Staff attitudes significantly influence aggression management, with over half of surveyed nurses holding neutral—not positive—views on causes and management.
  2. Nurses tended to disagree that patient factors, environment, or culture are primary causes of aggression, potentially overlooking key triggers and preventative strategies.
  3. Staff endorsed de-escalation techniques but also agreed on the necessity of seclusion and restraint, revealing mixed attitudes requiring targeted education.
Extended Takeaways
  1. This sample was early-career and relatively homogeneous: all respondents were aged 20–30 years, 87.9% were BSc educated, and 57.6% had 1–3 years of experience in psychiatry, which may help explain why attitudes were not associated with demographic or training variables in this cohort.
  2. Only 33 of 35 invited nurses completed the questionnaire, and 18 (54.5%) had a positive attitude while the remainder were neutral; no respondents were described as having a negative overall attitude, suggesting that uncertainty rather than overtly punitive views may be the more immediate educational target.
  3. Nurses rejected medication-centered management on multiple items, including disagreement that medications are a valuable approach for violent patients (mean=3.3), so ED training may need to explicitly address when pharmacologic strategies are indicated and how they fit alongside nonphysical approaches.
  4. Participants did not endorse that better one-to-one communication could reduce aggression, despite agreeing with negotiation and showing mixed views on de-escalation; this pattern suggests staff may accept interpersonal techniques in principle without linking routine communication quality to violence prevention.
  5. The Management of Aggression and Violence Scale used a cutoff of 2.5 for agreement on a 4-point Likert scale, and mean scores in the internal, external, and situational/interactional domains were all >2.5, indicating a broad tendency to discount multiple established contributors to aggression rather than attributing violence to any single cause.
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.

Insightful. Evidence-based. Human-centered.

Listen to the JCP Podcast Now
Figure: Digital illustration shows a human head with neural connections and podcast title over a dark blue patterned background.

Subscribe to read
more articles

Subscribe