Clinical Guide

How to Monitor Brexpiprazole Response in Schizophrenia With Hostility or Agitation

How should clinicians monitor functioning, hostility, and agitation when following a patient with schizophrenia treated with brexpiprazole?

When schizophrenia includes hostility or agitation, clinicians need a practical way to track whether treatment is helping beyond psychosis ratings alone. This guide reflects the monitoring framework used in the article's short-term and long-term brexpiprazole analyses, with attention to functioning as well as symptom response.

  1. Establish baseline functioning with the PSP

    Rate functioning with the Personal and Social Performance scale across socially useful activities, personal and social relationships, self-care, and disturbing and aggressive behaviors. The standard PSP total score ranges from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functioning, and the article notes that a change of about 10 points, or one category, has been suggested as potentially clinically meaningful.

  2. Consider whether hostility and agitation may directly influence PSP scoring

    Because the PSP includes a disturbing and aggressive behaviors domain, hostility and agitation can directly affect the total score. In this analysis, the authors addressed that by informally recalculating a modified 3-domain PSP using only socially useful activities, relationships, and self-care, with category midpoints assigned because exact clinician-judgment values could not be derived.

  3. Reassess at about 6 weeks for early functional change

    The short-term trials evaluated outcomes over 6 weeks, providing the key early monitoring interval in this article. Over 6 weeks, brexpiprazole was associated with greater functional improvement than placebo in participants with hostility and in participants with agitation, while participants without agitation showed a nonsignificant difference versus placebo.

  4. Track hostility response directly with PANSS P7

    For patients who met baseline hostility criteria, reassess PANSS P7 and determine whether the score has shifted below 3. In the short-term analysis, hostility response occurred in 72.7% of participants on brexpiprazole versus 61.8% on placebo by Week 6, so this threshold gives a concrete way to judge whether hostility has moved out of the mild-or-worse range used at baseline.

  5. Track agitation response with percentage change in PANSS-EC

    For patients who met baseline agitation criteria, calculate percent change in PANSS-EC from baseline and look for at least 40% improvement. In this study, agitation response numerically favored brexpiprazole at Week 6 but was not statistically significant versus placebo, so clinicians should monitor agitation directly rather than infer improvement solely from overall functioning.

  6. Reassess longitudinally if treatment continues

    In the long-term analysis, participants who continued brexpiprazole showed functional improvement that then stabilized over up to 58 weeks, both with and without baseline hostility or agitation. Hostility response reached 82.6% at Week 32 and 90.6% at Week 58, while agitation response reached 65.1% at Week 32 and 77.5% at Week 58.

Clinical Considerations

  • This was a post hoc, exploratory, hypothesis-generating analysis with nominal P values and no adjustment for multiple comparisons.
  • The long-term findings were descriptive and based on observed cases among participants who continued brexpiprazole, with 43.4% completing 58 weeks.
  • The modified 3-domain PSP was a novel informal approach that used category midpoints, had reduced variability, and requires further validation.
  • People with substance use disorders were excluded, which limits generalizability.

Bottom Line

When following brexpiprazole in schizophrenia with hostility or agitation, monitor both functioning and symptom-specific response, using about 6 weeks for early reassessment and continued longitudinal follow-up if treatment is maintained.

Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.