Key Takeaways

  1. In this symptomatic comorbid population, ADHD improvement was substantial by week 14/EOS, with mean (SD) AISRS and ASRSv1.1-SC total score changes of −17.3 (11.34) and −28.4 (14.89), and 71.8% and 45.6% of participants achieved ≥30% and ≥50% AISRS reduction, respectively.
  2. Mood and anxiety outcomes also crossed clinically relevant thresholds by week 14/EOS: ≥50% reduction was achieved by 57.5% on MADRS, 78.4% on PHQ-8, 70.8% on HAM-A, and 67.6% on GAD-7, with remission rates of 28.3%, 48.6%, 24.2%, and 43.2%, respectively.
  3. The study reflects common real-world polypharmacy rather than monotherapy use alone: 28.6% of participants took stimulants, 44.7% took antidepressants, and 14.9% took anxiolytic and/or hypnotic medications during treatment.
  4. Functional gains extended beyond symptom scales, with significant improvement at week 14/EOS in WPAI:SHP domains including presenteeism (mean [SD] change, −23.08 [26.072; P<.0001]), regular activity (−36.06 [24.230; P<.0001]), and work productivity (−22.32 [26.915; P<.0001]).
  5. Tolerability monitoring should emphasize early adverse effects and suicidality: TEAEs occurred in 70.8%, 14.9% discontinued because of TEAEs, and 5 participants (3.1%) reported TEAEs of suicidal ideation, including 2 serious cases on day 3 of study treatment.
  6. Cardiovascular changes were usually modest but not negligible, with 20.0% showing a >15 mm Hg increase in SBP, 13.3% a >15 mm Hg increase in DBP, and 10.2% a >20 beats per minute increase in pulse rate at week 14/EOS, even though related TEAEs were uncommon.
Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.