Clinical Guide

How to Avoid Curbside Care for Physician-Patients

How should clinicians respond when a physician-patient seeks informal curbside advice instead of formal care?

Physicians who become patients may try to preserve autonomy and avoid the discomfort of the patient role by asking colleagues for informal advice. The article highlights that this shortcut can blur boundaries, bypass structured history and examination, and increase the risk of faulty clinical conclusions.

  1. Recognize the curbside pattern

    Identify when a physician-patient is seeking medical advice outside the usual physician-patient relationship, such as asking a colleague for treatment in a hallway or office interruption. The article describes this as an attempt to avoid the challenging aspects of being a patient while preserving autonomy.

  2. Redirect the interaction into formal care

    Move the encounter into the more typical office or hospital setting rather than continuing an informal colleague-to-colleague exchange. The article warns that curbside consultations invite bias and inadequate history and examination, making faulty clinical conclusions more likely.

  3. Complete a structured clinical evaluation

    Do not assume the presenting problem is straightforward because the patient is a physician or a colleague. The article's New Amsterdam example shows that even when the informal advice happened to be correct, treatment was given without a physical examination, illustrating why structured evaluation should not be skipped.

  4. Maintain professional boundaries despite familiarity

    Be alert to the way professional familiarity can lower the threshold for advice-giving and can influence judgment. The article states that colleagues may let personal bias get ahead of professional responsibilities when caring for physician-patients informally.

Clinical Considerations

  • The article is a qualitative media-based review, not an outcomes study of a tested clinical protocol.
  • One media example involved a correct informal treatment decision, but the authors still caution that the same shortcut could easily go badly in real practice.
  • The review discusses curbside consultation as a recurrent risk but does not provide a validated triage tool for when informal requests occur.

Bottom Line

When a physician-patient seeks curbside advice, redirect care into a formal evaluation because informal colleague-to-colleague treatment increases the risk of bias, incomplete assessment, and misdiagnosis.

Read full article
Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc. (PPP) makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any information published in The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry or other PPP materials, and disclaims liability for any use or non-use of that information. Clinicians should not rely solely on these materials and should exercise their own professional judgment when making patient care decisions on an individualized basis.