This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.

Letters to the Editor

Sponsored Clinical Trials and Bias

Adrian Preda, MD

Published: October 15, 2007

Article Abstract

Because this piece does not have an abstract, we have provided for your benefit the first 3 sentences of the full text.’ ‹

Sir: I read with great interest your editorial1 and the 2 letters from the February 2007 issue of your journal2,3 highlighting the important concern about the source of funding influence on the outcome of interest.

In addition to the recent review by Heres et al.4 that you refer to in your editorial,1 the relationship between funding source and study outcome, which is so beautifully illustrated by the exchange between your 2 correspondents,2,3 was investigated in several other published studies.5-15 With one exception,11 these studies showed that industry support was uniformly associated with positive study outcome for the sponsored intervention either as a trend8 or, most times, at significant levels.5,6,9,10,12-15‘ ‹

Some JCP and PCC articles are available in PDF format only. Please click the PDF link at the top of this page to access the full text.

Related Articles

Volume: 68

Quick Links: Assessment Methods , Research Methods Statistics

Sign-up to stay
up-to-date today!


Already registered? Sign In


Comparative Effects of 11 Antipsychotics on Weight Gain and Metabolic Function in Patients With Acute Schizophrenia: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis

Although effects on weight gain have been explored for several antipsychotics, the role of dose in producing...