This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.


Beyond Categorical Classifications: The Importance of Identifying Posttrauma Symptom Trajectories and Associated Negative Outcomes

Sarra Nazem, PhD; Elizabeth G. Spitzer, MA; Lisa A. Brenner, PhD, ABPP; and Nazanin H. Bahraini, PhD

Published: September 25, 2014

See article by Madsen et al, and Commentary by Nazem et al.

This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.

Beyond Categorical Classifications: The Importance of Identifying Posttrauma Symptom Trajectories and Associated Negative Outcomes

Studies have shown that among veterans deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), as well as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), are associated with increased risk of suicidal ideation.1,2 By concurrently mapping longitudinal trajectories of PTSS with an observational assessment of suicidal ideation, Madsen and colleagues3 have significantly contributed to this line of research. Unlike previous studies, which have examined the relation between PTSS and suicidal ideation at a single time point, the study by Madsen et al3 used a longitudinal approach to explore how changes in PTSS presentations are linked to a distal suicide-related outcome. Furthermore, they illustrated how research aimed at identifying and characterizing heterogeneous symptom trajectories is critical to understanding different pathways to risk and resilience.

This work by Madsen et al3 represents a growing body of research that has applied novel analytic techniques to empirically examine the latent structure of posttraumatic responses. Historically, many have debated whether certain mental disorders, including PTSD, are best conceptualized using categorical (eg, pathology versus normality) or dimensional (eg, continuous symptoms) models. The categorical approach proposes that PTSD is distinct from normal responses to extreme stressors, in both degree and kind.4 In contrast, the dimensional model maintains that PTSD most likely represents the extreme end of a continuum of response to potentially traumatic exposure and that the symptom-based cut points signifying a pathological response are somewhat arbitrary.4,5 While it is important to appreciate the clinical and practical utility of categorical approaches to PTSS, reliance on approaches that draw a discrete line between normal and pathological responses to trauma preclude exploration of symptom variations that are indicative of resilient coping.6

Although philosophical and theoretical differences between categorical and dimensional approaches and their implications for the field of psychiatry have been extensively discussed, their underlying assumptions were, until recently, largely untested. However, developments in data analysis and statistical methods provided means to empirically test the validity of these different models. Early work in this area heavily relied on taxometric analysis, a statistical methodology specifically designed to test between categorical and dimensional models of latent variables.7 In fact, studies examining the latent structure of PTSS using taxometric analyses have demonstrated that the underlying latent structure of posttraumatic stress is more consistent with a dimensional rather than a categorical model.5,8,9

Since then, Andersen and colleagues10 as well as others (eg, Berntsen et al,11 Dickstein et al12) have examined the latent structure of PTSS responses using different approaches. Specifically, these prospective studies applied a set of analytic techniques (eg, latent class analysis, growth mixture modeling) to identify empirically validated symptom profiles that, once again, challenged the assumption that responses to potentially traumatic events develop in a fairly homogenous pattern across individuals. More importantly, Madsen et al3 extended this work to show how qualitatively distinct symptom trajectories were differentially linked to suicidal ideation.

The studies by Andersen et al10 and Madsen et al3 are particularly unique in that they offer a perspective on the categorical/dimensional debate that encourages an integration of both approaches (see also Kessler,13 Kraemer et al14). They showed that dimensional assessments of PTSS taken at different time points could be statistically transformed into 6 discrete classes or groupings that varied from each other, in regard to both their symptom patterns over time and their associations with suicidal ideation. In doing so, they underscored the utility of combining both models and highlighted several important areas for future work.

Research aimed at identifying unique risk and protective factors for distinct trajectory groups and related outcomes may offer additional insight into the etiologic underpinnings of different symptom courses and their relation to adverse outcomes, such as suicidal ideation. This includes consideration of other possible contributing factors to suicidal ideation (eg, depression, hopelessness, optimism) as well as relations between these factors and symptom trajectories. Along these lines, researchers may also consider how dimensional and categorical assessment can be used to advance understanding of etiologic factors—including the construct of trauma itself—as well as underlying psychological and neurobiological processes that may impact the onset and course of symptoms. Important questions remain unanswered regarding dimensional assessment of suicidal ideation (eg, intention, lethality, severity).15 Moreover, it would be important to show that variations in these predictors are linked to the different symptom profiles and their associated outcomes (eg, suicidal ideation) in meaningful ways. Only then can this information be used to tailor prevention and treatment strategies to selected groups.

In addition, clarification about trauma history, with a particular focus on identifying the relation between timing of exposure to a traumatic event and date of evaluation, would help clarify the temporal relation between these events and associated symptoms like suicidal ideation. Fine tuning assessment of temporal sequencing would be expected to facilitate understanding regarding the relative direction of potential causality. For example, the work by Madsen and colleagues3 raises the important question as to whether increases in suicidal ideation over the past year occurred concurrently with PTSS increases, or whether suicidal ideation developed as a result of PTSS changes. Research using longitudinal, multidimensional assessment strategies of suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviors with analyses of heterogeneity within symptom profile classes is encouraged. These additions have the potential to inform understanding regarding the dynamic nature of suicide risk, thereby contextualizing findings in a manner that would allow for moving beyond population-level analysis to using findings to facilitate person-specific suicide risk assessment.

The findings of Andersen et al10 and Madsen et al3 also highlight the importance of critical periods. Heterogeneous symptom trajectories, especially those that fluctuate over a longitudinal course, raise questions about timing of screening and delivery of interventions. Identification of critical periods based on initial symptom presentation most likely necessitate years of further empirical study and a more thorough understanding of unique etiologic factors. Until the field is able to accurately predict these critical periods, a transitional step may be to increase use of universal interventions aimed at ameliorating underlying shared susceptibilities, as well as promoting resilience. This method of intervention has been a focus of the transdiagnostic approach,16,17 which is built upon research suggesting that anxiety and depressive disorders share common underlying elements, such as negative affect. In regard to PTSD and suicidal ideation, shared cognitive and neuroanatomic factors, such as altered modulation of value attribution, reduced regulation of emotional and cognitive responses, and facilitation of acts in emotional contexts, may be areas for particular focus.18 For example, tailored interventions that target reduction of affective triggers and improve problem-solving abilities may improve emotion regulation abilities.19 This in turn would be expected to decrease risk for PTSD and suicidal behaviors. Focusing on reduction of overlapping susceptibilities prior to the development of pathological conditions (eg, PTSD) or behaviors (eg, suicide attempt) would also be expected to shift individual trajectories for some individuals, thereby negating the need for mental health interventions, which military personnel and veterans may find stigmatizing.

Although the focus of the current study3 was on suicidal ideation, findings have important implications for suicidal behavior. Specifically, the high proportion of late-onset group participants that had experienced adverse life events postdeployment suggests possible increases in acquired capability to inflict lethal self-injury, an important precursor and risk factor for death by suicide. According to the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide,20 the capability to engage in suicidal behavior is distinct from the desire to die by suicide and is strengthened by elevated pain tolerance and lowered fear of death. Thus, the accumulation of pre- and postdeployment traumatic events, whether these events are witnessed or directly experienced, may contribute heavily to acquired capability, thereby increasing risk for future suicidal behavior. Focusing on interventions aimed at decreasing desire for suicide, as well as providing psychoeducation about the risk of continued engagement in painful and provocative events, may be important clinical considerations for this high-risk group. Because environmental factors may play a pivotal role in reinforcing exposure to or engagement in further painful and provocative events (eg, unsafe housing, participation in a social group marked by impulsivity), providers might consider augmenting treatment approaches by targeting reasonably modifiable environmental factors (eg, means restriction, stimulus control, support system involvement) in addition to individual-level risk factors.

With the addition of these recent findings by Madsen and colleagues,3 as well as other seminal works (eg, Andersen et al,10 Berntsen et al,11 Dickstein et al,12 Ruscio et al8), sufficient evidence now exists to encourage widespread reconceptualization of PTSD from a dose response to a specific stressor to an adjustment to multiple stressors over the lifespan. Interestingly, we, the authors of this commentary, have previously made a similar argument in regard to understanding the range of outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury,21 the other signature condition22 of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. That is, short- and long-term challenges associated with poor functioning are "inextricably tied to . . . the unfolding of biological, psychological, and social processes through time."23(p134) Moreover, this switch will very likely allow for a more holistic approach to risk assessment, which takes into consideration events over the course of a lifespan. Thus, clinicians and researchers alike must continue to struggle to find balance between adoption of categorical models, which facilitate real world necessities such as billing for care, medical record documentation, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, and more nuanced understandings of responses to potentially traumatic events, which predict positive or negative outcomes such as suicidal ideation.

Author affiliations: US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Integrated Service Network 19 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (all authors), Denver; and Departments of Psychiatry (Drs Nazem, Brenner, and Bahraini), Neurology (Dr Brenner), and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Drs Brenner and Bahraini), University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver.

Potential conflicts of interest: None reported.

Funding/support: None reported.

Disclaimer: This commentary is based on work supported, in part, by the Department of Veterans Affairs, but does not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.


1. Jakupcak M, Hoerster KD, Varra A, et al. Hopelessness and suicidal ideation in Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans reporting subthreshold and threshold PTSD. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011;199:272-275. PubMed doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182124604

2. Jakupcak M, Cook J, Imel Z, et al. PTSD as a risk factor for suicidal ideation in Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans. J Trauma Stress. 2009;22:303-306. PubMed doi:10.1002/jts.20423

3. Madsen T, Karstoft K-I, Bertelsen M, et al. Postdeployment suicidal ideations and trajectories of posttraumatic stress disorder in Danish soldiers: a 3-year follow-up of the USPER study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75(9):994-1000.

4. Coghill D, Sonuga-Barke EJ. Annual research review: categories versus dimensions in the classification and conceptualisation of child and adolescent mental disorders—implications of recent empirical study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012;53(5):469-489. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02511.x

5. Forbes D, Haslam N, Williams BJ, et al. Testing the latent structure of posttraumatic stress disorder: a taxometric study of combat veterans. J Trauma Stress. 2005;18(6):647-656. PubMed doi:10.1002/jts.20073

6. Bonanno GA. Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Am Psychol. 2004;59(1):20-28. PubMed doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20

7. McGrath RE, Walters GD. Taxometric analysis as a general strategy for distinguishing categorical from dimensional latent structure. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(2):284-293. PubMed doi:10.1037/a0026973

8. Ruscio AM, Ruscio J, Keane TM. The latent structure of posttraumatic stress disorder: a taxometric investigation of reactions to extreme stress. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002;111(2):290-301. PubMed doi:10.1037/0021-843X.111.2.290

9. Broman-Fulks JJ, Ruggiero KJ, Green BA, et al. Taxometric Investigation of PTSD: data from two nationally representative samples. Behav Ther. 2006;37(4):364-380. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.beth.2006.02.006

10. Andersen SB, Karstoft K-I, Bertelsen M, et al. Latent trajectories of trauma symptoms and resilience: the 3-year longitudinal prospective USPER study of Danish veterans deployed in Afghanistan. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75(9):1001-1008.

11. Berntsen D, Johannessen KB, Thomsen YD, et al. Peace and war: trajectories of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms before, during, and after military deployment in Afghanistan. Psychol Sci. 2012;23(12):1557-1565. PubMed doi:10.1177/0956797612457389

12. Dickstein BD, Suvak M, Litz BT, et al. Heterogeneity in the course of posttraumatic stress disorder: trajectories of symptomatology. J Trauma Stress. 2010;23(3):331-339. PubMed

13. Kessler RC. The categorical versus dimensional assessment controversy in the sociology of mental illness. J Health Soc Behav. 2002;43(2):171-188. PubMed doi:10.2307/3090195

14. Kraemer HC, Noda A, O’ Hara R. Categorical versus dimensional approaches to diagnosis: methodological challenges. J Psychiatr Res. 2004;38(1):17-25. PubMed doi:10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00097-9

15. Brenner LA, Breshears RE, Betthauser LM, et al. Implementation of a suicide nomenclature within two VA healthcare settings. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2011;18(2):116-128. PubMed doi:10.1007/s10880-011-9240-9

16. Norton PJ, Philipp LM. Transdiagnostic approaches to the treatment of anxiety disorders: a quantitative review. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2008;45(2):214-226. PubMed doi:10.1037/0033-3204.45.2.214

17. Rector NA, Man V, Lerman B. The expanding cognitive-behavioural therapy treatment umbrella for the anxiety disorders: disorder-specific and transdiagnostic approaches. Can J Psychiatry. 2014;59(6):301-309. PubMed

18. Jollant F, Lawrence NL, Olié E, et al. The suicidal mind and brain: a review of neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011;12(5):319-339. PubMed doi:10.3109/15622975.2011.556200

19. Nazem S, Lonnquist E, Monteith L, et al. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors. In: Hudzik TJ, Cannon KE, eds. Suicide: Phenomenology and Neurobiology. New York, NY: Springer; In press.

20. Van Orden KA, Witte TK, Cukrowicz KC, et al. The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide. Psychol Rev. 2010;117(2):575-600. PubMed doi:10.1037/a0018697

21. Bahraini N, Brenner LA. Screening for TBI and persistent symptoms provides opportunities for prevention and intervention. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013;28(3):223-226. PubMed doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e318291dab7

22. Hoge CW, McGurk D, Thomas JL, et al. Mild traumatic brain injury in US soldiers returning from Iraq. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(5):453-463. PubMed doi:10.1056/NEJMoa072972

23. Thornberry TP, ed. A life course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In: Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers; 1997:133-161. Advances in Criminological Theory; vol. 7.

Submitted: August 18, 2014; accepted August 21, 2014.

Corresponding author: Nazanin H. Bahraini, PhD, VISN 19 MIRECC, 1055 Clermont St, Denver, CO 80220 (

Related Articles

Volume: 75

Quick Links: