This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.


Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine Recommendations: Identifying Costs

Willard G. Manning, Jr., PhD

Published: March 1, 1999

Article Abstract

The assignment of costs in a cost-effectiveness analysis is a complex and disputed issue. The Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine was convened to discuss standards that could be applied across a range of areas of cost-effectiveness. Additionally, the Panel had a mandate to resolve some controversial issues about the practice of cost-effectiveness that created difficulty in making comparisons across studies. The Panel proposed these guidelines: (1) Do at least some of the analysis from a social perspective; (2) Assign values to resources that reflect their opportunity costs; (3) Avoid zero counting of resources; (4) Avoid double counting of resources; (5) Make analyses only as exacting as necessary in a study. Difficulties in data collection were discussed. Among other questions considered by the panel were how to assign a value to the patient’s time and which productivity costs to include in a cost-effectiveness analysis. With tools and suggestions from the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, the cost analyst can report costs accurately and provide accurate comparisons of cost performance across states, trial modalities, or diseases.

Some JCP and PCC articles are available in PDF format only. Please click the PDF link at the top of this page to access the full text.

Volume: 60

Quick Links: