This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.

Letter to the Editor

Predictors of Suicide Attempt in Early-Onset Psychosis: Methodological Issues and Concerns

Vaibhav Patil, MD; Raman Deep Pattanayak, MD; and Ashwani Kumar Mishra, PhD

Published: December 15, 2013

See reply by Sanchez-Gistau and Castro-Fornieles and related article by Sanchez-Gistau et al.

Predictors of Suicide Attempt in Early-Onset Psychosis: Methodological Issues and Concerns

To the Editor: With reference to the recent article by Sanchez-Gistau et al,1 we wish to discuss a few methodological issues and concerns not previously discussed regarding the study limitations.

Our first issue regards the suitability of some instruments (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS], [Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HDRS]) for the study sample (aged 9-17 years) in view of their questionable or unknown validity in child and adolescent populations. The authors have not commented on this; however, the cross-referenced parent study indicates that adult scales were used for adolescent patients to act as a baseline comparison in their longitudinal cohort study.2 However, in the absence of validity, their use in a younger population at least for the purpose of present study does not seem to be justifiable. Instead, the assessments might have been done using the Kiddie-PANSS3 for psychotic symptoms, Children’s Depression Rating Scale4 for depressive symptoms, or other age-appropriate instruments. An additional limitation is that the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL) was simply translated into Spanish and not validated further for use.

Second, there were only 3 assessments in total, viz, baseline, 1-year, and 2-year (T0, T1, and T2), which appear to be too infrequent for a study with suicidality as a primary outcome. The intervening 1-year period was accounted for by only a single question ("Have you attempted suicide since the last visit?"). The use of repeated measures (eg, 3- or 6-monthly) and corroboration from family members or clinical records might have increased the robustness. Third, more than 80% of the sample was recruited from hospitalized patients, which indicates a sample that has a higher severity of illness at baseline, thereby influencing the generalizability of results.

Fourth, the reported scores on the Hollingshead-Redlich Scale (2.6 ± 1.2; see Table 1 in the article) appear to be inexplicable, as the minimum possible score on this scale is 11: both factors of this scale are assessed on a Likert scale from 1 to 7 and then their weighted values (× 7 for "occupation" and × 4 for "education") are summed, giving a possible range from 11 to 77.5 This standard scoring has been widely used in other scientific studies.6

From a statistical perspective, a few points need to be mentioned. The confidence intervals for each of the 3 variables for which logistic regression analysis showed significant differences (see Table 2 in the article) are quite wide, pointing to a large standard error. In the multivariate model, there is no mention of correction of P values, which could have been adjusted using Bonferroni or Š idák correction. Finally, there were too few positive observations (n = 10) in the dichotomous dependent variable; hence, the findings of regression analysis should be treated as exploratory and need replication in future studies.

Indeed, the study adds to the limited literature on suicidality in early-onset psychosis, and the findings are of clinical and public health significance. However, these findings should be interpreted in the light of the methodological limitations summarized above.


1. Sanchez-Gistau V, Baeza I, Arango C, et al. Predictors of suicide attempt in early-onset, first-episode psychoses: a longitudinal 24-month follow-up study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(1):59-66. PubMed doi:10.4088/JCP.12m07632

2. Castro-Fornieles J, Parellada M, Gonzalez-Pinto A, et al; CAFEPS group. The child and adolescent first-episode psychosis study (CAFEPS): design and baseline results. Schizophr Res. 2007;91(1-3):226-237. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.schres.2006.12.004

3. Fields JH, Grochowski S, Lindenmayer JP, et al. Assessing positive and negative symptoms in children and adolescents. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151(2):249-253. PubMed

4. Poznanski EO, Grossman JA, Buchsbaum Y, et al. Preliminary studies of the reliability and validity of the Children’s Depression Rating Scale. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 1984;23(2):191-197. PubMed doi:10.1097/00004583-198403000-00011

5. Hollingshead AB, Redlich FC. Social class and mental illness: a community study. 1958. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(10):1756-1757. PubMed doi:10.2105/AJPH.97.10.1756

6. Cooper DC, Mills PJ, Bardwell WA, et al. The effects of ethnic discrimination and socioeconomic status on endothelin-1 among blacks and whites. Am J Hypertens. 2009;22(7):698-704. PubMed doi:10.1038/ajh.2009.72

Vaibhav Patil, MD

Raman Deep Pattanayak, MD

Ashwani Kumar Mishra, PhD

Author affiliations: Department of Psychiatry and National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.

Potential conflicts of interest: None reported.

Funding/support: None reported.

Related Articles

Volume: 74

Quick Links: