psychiatrist

This work may not be copied, distributed, displayed, published, reproduced, transmitted, modified, posted, sold, licensed, or used for commercial purposes. By downloading this file, you are agreeing to the publisher’s Terms & Conditions.

Letter to the Editor

Auditory Hallucinations or Tinnitus? A Case of Framing Effects and a High Jugular Bulb

Evan Hy Einstein, BA; Mauricio González-Arias, MD; Akshatha Sunil Kamath, MD; Lindsey Channen, BS; and Taimur Mirza, MD

Published: August 31, 2017

Auditory Hallucinations or Tinnitus? A Case of Framing Effects and a High Jugular Bulb

To the Editor: Framing effects have an influence on medical decision-making; these effects stem from heuristics that physicians commonly use to diagnose patients.1 The framing itself may be created by the patient’s past medical history, family history, or specific associated symptom as examples. However, the bias created by framing can also lead to missed diagnoses.2,3 For example, tinnitus can occur in patients with a high jugular bulb,4,5 but if the clinical picture is framed with a history of psychosis, there is potential for bias toward labeling the subjective auditory symptom as a hallucination. The following case emphasizes this specific bias.

 

Case report. Mr A, a 56-year-old Hispanic, undomiciled, unemployed man, presented to the emergency department for chest pain and what seemed to be atypical tinnitus in his right ear. His past medical history included hypoacusia in the left ear due to meningitis during childhood, as well as hepatitis C, hypertension, depression, schizoaffective disorder, and polysubstance abuse. He had been attempting detoxification for both opiate and alcohol abuse, although these attempts were never successful as he claimed to have used both substances shortly before presenting to the hospital. He came to the emergency department complaining of chest tightness that was occurring for 1 week. However, he simultaneously complained of a very loud "ringing, beeping, and whistling" noise in his right ear. This noise was associated with headaches and agitation. He complained at the time of feeling depressed and having suicidal ideation, with the noise playing a significant role in his mood.

He was admitted to the medical floor initially to rule out an acute coronary syndrome. No laboratory abnormalities were noted at admission. After his chest pain was determined to be etiologically musculoskeletal, the psychiatry department was consulted for his depressive symptoms, and the otolaryngology (ENT) department was consulted for his auditory symptoms. The patient was eventually transferred to the psychiatry department because of his suicidal ideations. His diagnosis was noted to be schizophrenia (DSM-5 criteria) due to his constricted affect, poor insight and judgment, and poor reliability and impulse control and potentially due to his previous diagnoses and his auditory symptoms. His medications were reconciled, and he was started again on quetiapine, trazodone, lipitor, amlodipine, and aspirin.

Figure 1

Click figure to enlarge

The ENT consult discovered no significant clinical findings; the patient also disclosed no associated symptoms besides headache, agitation, and depression. A computed tomography (CT) angiogram was done to further investigate potential etiologies. The imaging showed a high right jugular bulb (Figure 1). Thus, there may have indeed been turbulent blood flow preceding a stenotic portion of his right internal jugular vein. This radiologic finding offered a potential alternative explanation for his auditory complaints besides the designation of auditory hallucinations.

 

The presence of a high jugular bulb, which can erode into the inner ear, was noted in 8.5% of temporal bone CT scans and 8.2% of temporal bone specimens.6 High jugular bulbs have been known to potentially cause a pulsatile tinnitus7 and a subjectively nonpulsatile tinnitus.4 They can also cause a variety of other inner ear disturbances, resulting in symptoms such as hearing loss, vertigo, and imbalance.5 Jugular vein ligation has been shown to successfully treat tinnitus, although the symptom has spontaneously regressed in some individuals.8 Nevertheless, surgical management is generally the most definitive treatment for this abnormality.9

Although this patient was a poor historian and provided a very nonspecific temporal account of his tinnitus, the presence of his jugular abnormality cannot be ignored as an etiology for his symptoms. Framing effects were certainly witnessed in the management of this patient with regard to his past psychiatric history of schizoaffective disorder and his current suicidal ideations. These effects allowed for a delay in referral to treat his tinnitus and potentially reduce his psychosocial comorbidities.

Framing effects have a significant influence on medical decision-making.1-3 It has also been suggested that framing effects are generally underappreciated and understudied in common medical practice.10 Diagnostic checklists, including an effective cognitive approach, may reduce the risk of failed heuristics.11 Nevertheless, framing effects and other medical decision-making biases should be further empirically studied so that patients may receive the best possible treatment.

References

1. Gong J, Zhang Y, Yang Z, et al. The framing effect in medical decision-making: a review of the literature. Psychol Health Med. 2013;18(6):645-653. PubMed doi:10.1080/13548506.2013.766352

2. Vickrey BG, Samuels MA, Ropper AH. How neurologists think: a cognitive psychology perspective on missed diagnoses. Ann Neurol. 2010;67(4):425-433. PubMed doi:10.1002/ana.21907

3. Leo RJ, DuBois RL. A case of olfactory groove meningioma misdiagnosed as schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(1):67-68. PubMed doi:10.4088/JCP.15cr09829

4. Bektas D, Caylan R. Non-pulsatile subjective tinnitus without hearing loss may be caused by undetectable sounds originating from venous system of the brain. Med Hypotheses. 2008;71(2):245-248. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2008.03.024

5. Friedmann DR, Eubig J, Winata LS, et al. A clinical and histopathologic study of jugular bulb abnormalities. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(1):66-71. PubMed doi:10.1001/archoto.2011.231

6. Friedmann DR, Eubig J, Winata LS, et al. Prevalence of jugular bulb abnormalities and resultant inner ear dehiscence: a histopathologic and radiologic study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;147(4):750-756. PubMed doi:10.1177/0194599812448615

7. Reardon MA, Raghavan P. Venous abnormalities leading to tinnitus: Imaging evaluation. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2016;26(2):237-245. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.nic.2015.12.006

8. Golueke PJ, Panetta T, Sclafani S, et al. Tinnitus originating from an abnormal jugular bulb: treatment by jugular vein ligation. J Vasc Surg. 1987;6(3):248-251. PubMed doi:10.1016/0741-5214(87)90036-X

9. Roberts DS, Chen B, Slattery W. Surgical management of a high jugular bulb. Ear Nose Throat J. 2016;95(8):306-309. PubMed

10. Blumenthal-Barby JS, Krieger H. Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(4):539-557. PubMed doi:10.1177/0272989X14547740

11. Ely JW, Graber ML, Croskerry P. Checklists to reduce diagnostic errors. Acad Med. 2011;86(3):307-313. PubMed doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820824cd

Evan Hy Einstein, BAa

evan_einstein@nymc.edu

Mauricio González-Arias, MDb

Akshatha Sunil Kamath, MDb

Lindsey Channen, BSa

Taimur Mirza, MDb

aNew York Medical College, Valhalla, New York

bMetropolitan Hospital Center, New York, New York

Conflicts of interest: None.

Funding/support: None.

Patient consent: Verbal permission was received from the patient to publish this case, and the information was de-identified to protect anonymity.

Published online: August 31, 2017.

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2017;19(4):17l02108

https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.17l02108

© Copyright 2017 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Related Articles

Volume: 19

Quick Links:

$40.00

Buy this Article as a PDF